<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disney: Could "Up" Be Pixar's First Dud?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090210/disney-could-up-be-pixars-first-dud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090210/disney-could-up-be-pixars-first-dud/</link>
	<description>from other Web sites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:42:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2nd week of Feb &#8216;09 blogging</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090210/disney-could-up-be-pixars-first-dud/comment-page-1/#comment-1376</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2nd week of Feb &#8216;09 blogging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=8401#comment-1376</guid>
		<description>[...] 9 out of 10 ain&#8217;t bad [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 9 out of 10 ain&#8217;t bad [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Sanders</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090210/disney-could-up-be-pixars-first-dud/comment-page-1/#comment-1372</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Sanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=8401#comment-1372</guid>
		<description>As several readers have noted over at the Barron&#039;s blog, who cares what a financial analyst thinks about a half-finished movie? I mean, could anything be less relevant to anything (except filling the space in your column)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As several readers have noted over at the Barron&#8217;s blog, who cares what a financial analyst thinks about a half-finished movie? I mean, could anything be less relevant to anything (except filling the space in your column)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Omega</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090210/disney-could-up-be-pixars-first-dud/comment-page-1/#comment-1370</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Omega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=8401#comment-1370</guid>
		<description>10 for 10...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10 for 10&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Welch</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090210/disney-could-up-be-pixars-first-dud/comment-page-1/#comment-1368</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Welch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=8401#comment-1368</guid>
		<description>For Cars, Ratatouille and Wall-E, I&#039;ve thought the exact same thing. Especially Cars. There is no reason to ask the question is such a negative way. Do you have ANY reason to think it other than you can&#039;t believe anyone could do what Pixar is doing?

As long as Steve Jobs is the majority stockholder at Disney, Pixar will be treated by Disney in a hands-off manner. And that can only be good. Because Disney&#039;s business model doesn&#039;t allow for quality at Pixar&#039;s level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Cars, Ratatouille and Wall-E, I&#8217;ve thought the exact same thing. Especially Cars. There is no reason to ask the question is such a negative way. Do you have ANY reason to think it other than you can&#8217;t believe anyone could do what Pixar is doing?</p>
<p>As long as Steve Jobs is the majority stockholder at Disney, Pixar will be treated by Disney in a hands-off manner. And that can only be good. Because Disney&#8217;s business model doesn&#8217;t allow for quality at Pixar&#8217;s level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

