<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fear the Kindle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090227/fear-the-kindle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090227/fear-the-kindle/</link>
	<description>from other Web sites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:42:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac Beach</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090227/fear-the-kindle/comment-page-1/#comment-1481</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac Beach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=8918#comment-1481</guid>
		<description>I got a Kindle, I like the Kindle, but it is far from perfect.  It doesn&#039;t disappear in my hands, and it would be rather inconvenient if it did.  If I &quot;curled up with&quot; a book, i.e. fell asleep on it, I&#039;d not have to worry about waking up with a broken book.

The book industry is going to be radically diminished by the fact that fewer people read (anything, not just books).  With Kindle (and like devices) a publisher doesn&#039;t have to make a guess about how many copies of a work will be purchased, nor does a work ever have to &quot;go out of print&quot;.  Big advantages for everyone except the printing press owner (which people need to soon distinguish from &quot;publisher&quot;.)

On the other hand the Kindle doesn&#039;t make it easy to organize your books (unless you only have 8 of them).  It needs some sort of folder/tagging mechanism to categorize things so you don&#039;t have to scroll through a seemingly endless list.

I don&#039;t like the DRM aspects, but that just serves to hurt Amazons business as I&#039;ll mostly purchase things (subscriptions) and avail myself of free content to avoid the issue.

Once there are a variety of similar devices in wide use it would be nice for a standard to be developed that allows a copyrighted work to be purchased once and travel from one device to another (same owner).  I suggest the geerheads start working on such a thing now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a Kindle, I like the Kindle, but it is far from perfect.  It doesn&#8217;t disappear in my hands, and it would be rather inconvenient if it did.  If I &#8220;curled up with&#8221; a book, i.e. fell asleep on it, I&#8217;d not have to worry about waking up with a broken book.</p>
<p>The book industry is going to be radically diminished by the fact that fewer people read (anything, not just books).  With Kindle (and like devices) a publisher doesn&#8217;t have to make a guess about how many copies of a work will be purchased, nor does a work ever have to &#8220;go out of print&#8221;.  Big advantages for everyone except the printing press owner (which people need to soon distinguish from &#8220;publisher&#8221;.)</p>
<p>On the other hand the Kindle doesn&#8217;t make it easy to organize your books (unless you only have 8 of them).  It needs some sort of folder/tagging mechanism to categorize things so you don&#8217;t have to scroll through a seemingly endless list.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like the DRM aspects, but that just serves to hurt Amazons business as I&#8217;ll mostly purchase things (subscriptions) and avail myself of free content to avoid the issue.</p>
<p>Once there are a variety of similar devices in wide use it would be nice for a standard to be developed that allows a copyrighted work to be purchased once and travel from one device to another (same owner).  I suggest the geerheads start working on such a thing now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

