All Things Digital

Skip to main content.

All posts tagged ‘CD’

Tuesday, April 8, 2008

Home Copying–Burnt Into Teenage Psyche

Katie Allen

More than half of young people copy the songs on their hard drives to friends and even more swap CD copies, according to research that reveals the huge challenge home copying poses to a music industry already battling Internet file-sharing. Three decades after cassette decks first allowed people to make free music tapes for friends, a study by the industry group British Music Rights suggests home copying remains just as ingrained in U.K. culture.

Read the rest of this post

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Wal-Mart Wants $10 CDs

Warren Cohen

Wal-mart wants every CD you buy to cost less than 10 bucks. And the nation’s largest retailer–which moved a quarter of a trillion dollars’ worth of goods last year–usually gets its way. Suppliers who don’t accede to Wal-Mart’s “everyday low price” mantra often find their products bounced from the chain’s stores, excluded from being sold to the 138 million people who shop at a Wal-Mart store every week.

Read the rest of this post

Thursday, January 31, 2008

A Rare Post About the Music Industry That Isn’t Completely Depressing

Jimmy Guterman

The Qtrax debacle is getting most of the attention this week, with Warner Music’s ridiculous CEO compensation close behind, but there is promising news in the music industry worth noting. Late last year, there was much fuss around Radiohead’s decision to eschew usual distribution schemes and release “In Rainbows” in a variety of formats, among them free downloads. It was no surprise that the marketing plan worked well and, more recently, helped the on-CD version of the new album top many sales charts. Radiohead is an extremely popular band; of course its experiment did well. But if there’s going to be a music industry anymore, it’s going to be because nonplatinum performers can make a living as musicians.

Read the rest of this post

Monday, January 21, 2008

The Album Is Dead…

Mark Cuban

There once was a time when the release date of an album was exciting. For our favorite artists, we knew when the last album came out and when the next album was due. If you loved the artist, you bought it. If you didn’t, you either bought the single or you listened to the album with your friends and then decided.

As the price of records and then CDs increased year by year, spending 20 bucks for a CD became a purchase you needed to be sure of rather than a no-brainer or impulse buy.

Then free became an option.

Then aggregating almost unlimited free music on a PC and then an iPod became easy.

So here we are in 2008 and the only given in the music industry is that CD sales have and will fall. And fall. And fall.

Read the rest of this post

Thursday, December 27, 2007

Giving, Taking Pirated Carols

Dawn C. Chmielewski

Chestnuts roasting on an open fire. Jack Frost ripping a CD.

Online piracy is creating a modern-day twist on “The Christmas Song.” Nat King Cole’s recording of the holiday standard is among the most popular downloads on file-sharing networks this year.

Read the rest of this post

Wednesday, September 5, 2007

Calling All Recording Gurus: I’ve Got Nothing to Prove, but I Still Need Your Help (See My Video!)

Jill Sobule

What do I do now?

In 1991, I released my first record on MCA (or MCI, as my mom always mistakenly told her friends, hoping to impress them). I was bummed, as I had just missed the opportunity to have my face big on an album cover. But vinyl was over, and the CD format (with the long cardboard box–remember that?) was the wave of the future.

Since then, I have been dropped by two major labels and languished on two indies that both went bankrupt.

Well, no one in my world (the music industry) seems to really know what to do. That’s why I am asking you D geeks if you have any ideas.

Right now I have plenty of what I think are really swell songs. Here’s one:

None of my musician friends are mourning the demise of the record industry. Most of us got crummy deals anyway and never saw a penny of royalties. My nephews expect really expensive birthday gifts from me, as they think that I must be rolling in dough, having been on MTV a few times. I always acquiesce, not wanting to tell them the truth.

For us, in this YouTube, long-tail, Kara-and-Walt world, it’s an exciting time. But it’s also confusing. How do I release my next recordings? Do I still put out a CD in the traditional way, or just go digital? Do I send demos one last time to the remaining majors or go indie (this time with a company that lasts longer than a year) and get a, say, 50/50 deal? Do I just finance the whole thing myself–musicians, studio, marketing, publicist, radio, promo, video, etc.? And where do I get the money? How do I pay the rent? How do I support my gambling and morphine habits?

One thing I am doing is working with the guys at QiGO (who presented their invention, a key-shaped USB device that launches a predetermined Web site when connected to a computer, this year at D5). One of my strong points is my live performance (I have heard). I sell my CDs at the concerts, but people who are fans already have them. Plus, some feel that the recordings do not, and cannot have, the fun and spontaneity of a live show. Some artists drag a bunch of CD burners to tape their shows. People will stand in line for hours to get a copy of the concert they just saw. I had this idea with Dan Klitsner (co-founder of QiGO) that we could sell his little USB keys, people could go home and the next day they could download the show. We gave away keys at my last New York show, and everyone seemed to really like it. (We are still working out the kinks.)

Now to the question of how to finance a new album (I still like saying “album”). I once had this idea of asking my fans to chip in and become “stockholders,” sort of like investors in Broadway shows. So one fan could give maybe $100, and a wealthier one could give a grand or more. Once the record breaks even, they would get their money back and subsequently a cut of the profits–if any. And they would all feel part of the success of a smash-hit record–fun! My manager and lawyer were so not into it and discouraged me. They said it would be a nightmare on all fronts. I still do kind of like the idea. Plus, these days, to make a record does not cost as much as it once did. Everybody and everybody’s brother has Pro Tools or GarageBand in their computers. The big-time studios have had to cut down their rates substantially.

Thoughts? Ideas? Comments?

Help.

By the way, I don’t have a morphine or gambling problem…yet.

Wednesday, August 1, 2007

Do You Want to Do What You Did Before … or Do You Want to Do Something Interesting?

Jimmy Guterman

Recently I produced a CD. It was independently recorded and distributed–and it was available for free on every peer-to-peer service on the planet weeks before it was officially released, so it was only a modest commercial success.

Don’t feel bad. It was entirely expected. Even if there was such a thing as a record industry anymore, no one would expect a double-disc tribute to a 27-year-old album by The Clash to keep Avril or Pink from the top of the charts. But there’s one reaction the record has received that has helped me understand something about the broader media business: the danger of looking backward.

Back when I started the project in 2003, I was delusional enough to think I could get someone else to fund it. I spoke to executives at large multinational record companies and small independent companies, and they all told me, with varying degrees of politeness, to get lost. A few told me it was a crazy idea, a few more told me it was a bad idea and some told me, with that level of snideness only record-company executives can manage, that I’d never finish the project.

But when the record came out, I heard from several record-company executives. Some of them just wanted free copies, some wanted to offer me mild kudos and almost all of them–including one who had rejected the record back in 2003 but forgotten–asked me some version of “Why didn’t you come to us so we could have put this out?”

Aside from reminding me that some people in the record industry view memory loss as a core competency, this reversal in my fortune now that I could no longer do anything about it gave me a clue to where the media industry is right now. Around the same time the record came out, the founder of a dot-com magazine that crashed and burned reminisced with me about an email newsletter I started while the ashes of that magazine were still warm. The newsletter failed, too, in large part because in 2002 online advertising had fallen off a cliff and hit the bottom of the canyon a la Wile E. Coyote. “If you started that now,” he said, “It would be a big success.”

Perhaps. But I don’t have to start it now. The media and technology businesses are now different than they were in 2002 and 2003. When I started the online newsletter in 2002, no one else was dumb enough to try that. Now it seems as if everyone has at least a semipro blog. When I started soliciting performers for the record in 2003, no one else was stupid enough to try and assemble 36 performers to redo–for free!–a long-forgotten record. Now tribute albums are all the rage. Is it just that I have uncannily bad commercial timing?

It is true that I would have an easier time funding something now than four to five years ago. Everyone else is. Indeed, as uncov and others report so gleefully, moronic ideas are getting funded again, while five years ago even a recipe for eternal life might have had trouble scoring a meeting on Sand Hill Road.

But the response I received should make entrepreneurs–and the people who fund them–wary. In both the case of the record and the email newsletter, I was told by experts that something I did at a different time would be successful now. Wrong! If I merely updated or replicated an old idea, it would still be an old idea. But today’s business environment is all about innovation. At its best, it’s about the next thing, not a redo of the last thing. The start-ups most likely to fail are the retreads, the wannabes, the copycats, the ones that mistake features for full-fledged services.

Look at the record industry if you want to see what happens to an industry that reflexively looks backward for ideas. Know your history but don’t be limited by it. At their best, media and technology are about the new. If you had an old idea that people like, say thank you. But, if you want success, keep that old idea where it is and come up with something fresh.

Monday, May 28, 2007

The Day the Music Died: Somehow I Missed It

Jesse Kornbluth

I keep reading how the music industry killed the CD and now nobody on the Web can sell anything longer than a three-minute download. How odd. I sell music–on some days, I believe, more of a given CD than any single store in the country, including Amazon.com–and I do it from a Web site that never has more than 7,000 visitors a day. Even stranger, I sell music without really trying.

This is not the music you see reviewed in glossy magazines. Nor are the books and DVDs I praise. On HeadButler.com, I’m interested in the eternally great and often overlooked, not the just-launched and excessively hyped: writers like Jean Rhys and Brad Kessler; musicians like Ann Peebles and C.C. Adcock; and films like “L’Atalante” and “In America.” Happily, there’s no sell-by date on the Long Tail of the Internet; a 1930 Jean Rhys novel is as easy to find as C.C. Adcock’s post-millennial swamp rock.

At launch, I put a “to buy from Amazon.com” link at the bottom of each recommendation. But I never expected my site to be a moneymaker, so I ignored my daily Amazon sales reports for months. Then my first royalty check arrived–and I hurried to Amazon to discover that, although I mostly reviewed books, I was selling a steady stream of CDs.

And what I was selling was revealing. My endorsements of most recent rock CDs left readers unmoved. But when I praised a classic–like Van Morrison’s l968 “Astral Weeks”–it became a consistent seller. So did American roots music: Emmylou Harris, Buddy Miller. And world music: Cesaria Evora, Radio Tarifa, Andy Palacio. And some jazz, some classical. In short, music in niches.

That’s a lot of great music, but even with promotion, very little of it will sell in large numbers. How do I know? Last fall, NPR asked me, as Head Butler, to be an occasional contributor to the weekend edition of “All Things Considered.” One of the first CDs I praised was “Dimanche à Bamako,” a 2005 release by Amadou & Mariam. Few know them, with good reason. They’re from Mali. They sing mostly in French. They’re blind. And they rarely tour. HeadButler.com readers bought 70 copies of their CD; after I raved about them on radio, 700 listeners bought it.

An Amazon check for my cut of those 770 CDs may be sweet for a little concierge site like mine, but with NPR’s global power in the mix, sales at this level represent more terrible news for the big record companies. Consider: When a Head Butler recommendation on NPR can take Noirin Ni Riain, the cult Irish singer, from No. 48,000 on Amazon.com to No. 14 in a few hours–on just 260 CDs–you know that nothing’s selling in massive quantities.

James Q. Wilson, professor emeritus at UCLA’s Anderson School of Management, once remarked that organizations tend to have the same internal structure and characteristics as their primary competitors. When the competition in the music business was between successful giants, that was fine. But now the competition is between a few large corporations on one side and a galaxy of small labels and sole proprietors–unsigned bands with MySpace presence and MBA thinking–on the other.

This David vs. Goliath drama is the most familiar story of the last half-century–it’s the story of asymmetric warfare. It starts with the mighty French being forced out of Vietnam, continues with the French losing their Algerian colony and segues into the American defeat in Vietnam.

As for Iraq, in the summer of 2003, the Defense Department screened “The Battle of Algiers,” the Gillo Pontecorvo film that shows exactly how the National Liberation Front–a small group of revolutionaries divided into “cells” of three–was able to organize a revolt that defied and then paralyzed the French army. The Pentagon audience couldn’t have missed the lessons. Even if you kill a rebel leader, another one immediately takes his place. And, most to the point, an army of occupation can never win.

EMI is not Iraq. But the tide of history is running against the large record companies as surely as history is showing that people everywhere have a problem with empires. Unless there’s a radical upturn in music sales, the big labels won’t be able to live on what they earn–their business model will take them down.

The big labels can’t be bothered with the likes of me. And yet there are labels that can afford to care about a site that rarely sells 30 CDs a day. Compass Records, out of Nashville. Yep Roc, in North Carolina. Cumbancha, in Vermont. And the “giant” of the group: Putumayo. Plus dozens of sole proprietors who do everything from making the music to licking the stamps.

“Little man whip a big man every time if the little man is in the right and keeps on coming”–that’s the motto of the Texas Rangers. We tend to dismiss that as romantic, nostalgic, inoperative. In fact, it could be the summary of recent world history. And of the American music business.

Small can now compete with big–can surpass big–because, more and more, the key to selling music that delivers real and deep pleasure is not to sell it. People don’t want to be sold; they’ve been burned too often by “must have” CDs with only one good song. Instead, they want to be told. They want the story of the CD and a profile of the creator; they want to know why they should buy more than one song. That’s a civilized conversation. That’s old-fashioned “hand selling.”

There’s nothing magical about this. It’s in the American tradition of the knowledgeable enthusiast, more motivated by love than money, carving out a niche in his community. It’s about high standards and low profits. And then it’s about seizing opportunities.

It’s not a total solution, but I submit that the big music labels would do well to break themselves up into many small companies that, like the tiny cells of “The Battle of Algiers,” have absolute responsibility for a handful of musicians. And then those splinters of the former giants should cozy up to boutiques like mine and do the thing that the industry currently resists–sell music to one listener at a time.

Featured Video

About Voices

All content for Voices is selected by, and/or solicited by, the editors of All Things Digital. We do not publish unsolicited or over-the-transom submissions.

Read more »

Latest Voices

List of all voices »

About the Site

Because the site is wholly owned by Dow Jones, publisher of The Wall Street Journal, we aim to adhere to the journalistic standards of the best of the mainstream media. But, because it is run autonomously as a small online startup, we aim to exhibit the fresh thinking and nimbleness of the best of the new media. We want to be first, and sassy, but also well sourced and accurate. We will offer lots of opinion and analysis, but plenty of fact as well.

Read more »