<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Voices &#187; semiconductors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://voices.allthingsd.com/category/semiconductors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com</link>
	<description>from other Web sites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>IBM Reveals the Biggest Artificial Brain of All Time</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091120/ibm-reveals-the-biggest-artificial-brain-of-all-time/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091120/ibm-reveals-the-biggest-artificial-brain-of-all-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Fox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Douglas Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular Mechanics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supercomputer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=18153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientists at IBM's Almaden research center have built the biggest artificial brain ever--a cell-by-cell simulation of the human visual cortex: 1.6 billion virtual neurons connected by 9 trillion synapses.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Douglas Fox, Writer, Popular Mechanics</p>
<p>Scientists at IBM&#8217;s (IBM) Almaden research center have built the biggest artificial brain ever&#8211;a cell-by-cell simulation of the human visual cortex: 1.6 billion virtual neurons connected by 9 trillion synapses. This computer simulation, as large as a cat&#8217;s brain, blows away the previous record&#8211;a simulated rat&#8217;s brain with 55 million neurons&#8211;built by the same team two years ago. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/industry/4337190.html">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091120/ibm-reveals-the-biggest-artificial-brain-of-all-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Merrill Turns Cautious on Chips, Foundries; Many Downgrades; Stocks Swoon</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091119/merrill-turns-cautious-on-chips-foundries-many-downgrades-stocks-swoon/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091119/merrill-turns-cautious-on-chips-foundries-many-downgrades-stocks-swoon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Savitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America/Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barron's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Heyler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Savitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sumit Dhanda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Trader Daily]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=18100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bank of America/Merrill Lynch chip analyst Sumit Dhanda this morning turned cautious on semiconductor stocks, downgrading a slew of stocks; his colleague Daniel Heyler made a comparable on the foundries, lower ratings on a number of stocks.

“We are downgrading our view on the sector given unfavorable indications from our cyclical framework,” he writes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Eric Savitz, Columnist, Barron&#8217;s, Tech Trader Daily</p>
<p>Bank of America/Merrill Lynch (BAC) chip analyst Sumit Dhanda this morning turned cautious on semiconductor stocks, downgrading a slew of stocks; his colleague Daniel Heyler made a comparable on the foundries, lower ratings on a number of stocks.</p>
<p>“We are downgrading our view on the sector given unfavorable indications from our cyclical framework,” he writes. “In particular, our industry model suggests that following a period of rapid replenishment of inventory and normalization of semi shipments to true consumption levels, inventories in the supply chain are approaching a level suggesting a modest overshoot versus equilibrium levels. While we see limited risk to near-term estimates, we think the longer this persists the great the risk of a correction in the supply chain. Barring a sharp upturn in the global economies, this, in our view, renders the risk reward associated with ownership of chip stocks unattractive.”</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2009/11/19/merrill-turns-cautious-on-chips-foundries-many-downgrades-stocks-swoon/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091119/merrill-turns-cautious-on-chips-foundries-many-downgrades-stocks-swoon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Intel-AMD Settlement: A Play-by-Play</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091117/the-intel-amd-settlement-a-play-by-play/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091117/the-intel-amd-settlement-a-play-by-play/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arik Hesseldahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arik Hesseldahl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law suit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=17960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It took a mediator--and a trip to Maui--to break the biggest logjam in landmark settlement talks between Intel and Advanced Micro Devices.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Arik Hesseldahl, Technology Writer, BusinessWeek.com</p>
<p>It took a mediator&#8211;and a trip to Maui&#8211;to break the biggest logjam in landmark settlement talks between Intel (INTC) and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD). Before arriving at the agreement that ended years of acrimony and legal wrangling between the world&#8217;s largest makers of computer chips, representatives of each needed to answer one fundamental question: How much money would change hands? </p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/nov2009/tc20091115_692400.htm">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091117/the-intel-amd-settlement-a-play-by-play/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Faster Supercomputers: Your Tax Dollars at Work</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091113/faster-supercomputers-your-tax-dollars-at-work/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091113/faster-supercomputers-your-tax-dollars-at-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 00:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aircraft design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linpack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microprocessors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supercomputer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top500]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=17906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Monday, researchers will release a twice-yearly list of the 500 biggest computers in the world. The latest rankings should provide some new clues about high tech’s relentless speed race, and how it’s being funded.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Don Clark, Reporter, The Wall Street Journal</p>
<p>On Monday, researchers will release a twice-yearly list of the 500 biggest computers in the world. The latest rankings should provide some new clues about high tech’s relentless speed race, and how it’s being funded.</p>
<p>National labs and other research institutions buy these supercomputers to handle huge number-crunching tasks, like modeling weather patterns, nuclear explosions and aircraft designs. They rely heavily on advances from the semiconductor industry, since each system uses thousands of microprocessor chips–typically supplied by Intel, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and IBM (IBM).</p>
<p>Rankings on the so-called Top500 list are determined by performing a set of mathematical calculations known as Linpack that indicate how fast a system is.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/11/13/faster-supercomputers-your-tax-dollars-at-work/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091113/faster-supercomputers-your-tax-dollars-at-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roth Cuts Intel, Several Chips</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091028/roth-cuts-intel-several-chips/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091028/roth-cuts-intel-several-chips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Savitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arnab Chanda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barron's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Savitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marvell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roth Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Trader Daily]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=17140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roth Capital Partners analyst Arnab Chanda this morning lowered his rating on several chip stocks to “Hold” from “Buy,” citing the risk of a modest inventory build given high projected margins and growth at Intel, Marvell, Nvidia and others.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Eric Savitz, Blogger and Columnist, Barron&#8217;s, Tech Trader Daily</p>
<p>Roth Capital Partners analyst Arnab Chanda this morning lowered his rating on several chip stocks to “Hold” from “Buy,” citing the risk of a modest inventory build given high projected margins and growth at Intel (INTC), Marvell (MRVL), Nvidia (NVDA) and others.</p>
<p>“Overall, we’re getting the sense that lead times in the semi industry have gone up a lot. There may be orders that are ‘phantom,’ or double-orders,” Chanda told me in a phone conversation this morning.</p>
<p>“Second, the PC end markets are probably flat year over year, but look at Intel’s [projected Q4 revenue] growth of 23 percent, Marvell’s 50 percent, Nvidia’s 80 percent&#8211;that just seems like there’s some “exuberance” embedded in that,” says Chanda.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2009/10/28/roth-capital-cuts-intel-several-chips/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091028/roth-cuts-intel-several-chips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Broadcom Slumps; Q3 Results Top Estimates; Sees Sequentially Flat Q4 Revenue (Revised)</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091022/broadcom-slumps-q3-results-top-estimates-sees-sequentially-flat-q4-revs-revised/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091022/broadcom-slumps-q3-results-top-estimates-sees-sequentially-flat-q4-revs-revised/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Savitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barron's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Savitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Trader Daily]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=16945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Broadcom shares are down sharply in late trading after the chip maker posted Q3 earnings. For the quarter, the company reported revenue of $1.254 billion, up 20.6 percent from the second quarter, down 3.4 percent from a year ago, and ahead of the Street at $1.16 billion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Eric Savitz, Blogger and Columnist, Barron&#8217;s, Tech Trader Daily</p>
<p>Broadcom (BRCM) shares are down sharply in late trading after the chip maker posted Q3 earnings.</p>
<p><em>Note: Broadcom has the confusing habit of reporting only GAAP profits, while the Street tracks non-GAAP results. This made it look like the company suffered a huge earnings miss in the quarter, although this turns out not to be the case. Read on.</em></p>
<p>For the quarter, the company reported revenue of $1.254 billion, up 20.6 percent from the second quarter, down 3.4 percent from a year ago, and ahead of the Street at $1.16 billion.</p>
<p>GAAP EPS was 16 cents a share, which a Broadcom spokesman notes is above the Street at 11 cents. On a non-GAAP basis&#8211;a number not in the release&#8211;the company earned 40 cents, beating the Street consensus at 33 cents.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2009/10/22/broadcom-slumps-as-q3-eps-whiffs-on-higher-compensation-costs/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091022/broadcom-slumps-q3-results-top-estimates-sees-sequentially-flat-q4-revs-revised/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did PC Makers Overbuild in Anticipation of Windows 7?</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091016/did-pc-makers-over-build-in-anticipation-of-windows-7/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091016/did-pc-makers-over-build-in-anticipation-of-windows-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Savitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barron's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Savitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Trader Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=16715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comments by Advanced Micro Devices yesterday apparently have triggered worries on the Street that the PC manufacturers, in their zealous optimism about the prospects for Microsoft Windows 7, may have built too many PCs.

As I noted last night, AMD said on its post-earnings conference call with the Street that it expects a less-than-seasonal sequential increase in Q4 revenues, due in part to the “the big build we’ve seen of PCs in anticipation of the Win 7 launch.”]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Eric Savitz, Blogger and Columnist, Barron&#8217;s, Tech Trader Daily</p>
<p>Comments by Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) yesterday apparently have triggered worries on the Street that the PC manufacturers, in their zealous optimism about the prospects for Microsoft Windows 7 (MSFT), may have built too many PCs.</p>
<p>As <a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2009/10/15/amd-sees-less-than-seasonal-q4-rev-boost-from-q3-says-big-build-of-pc-inventories-ahead-of-win-7/">I noted last night</a>, AMD said on its post-earnings conference call with the Street that it expects a less-than-seasonal sequential increase in Q4 revenues, due in part to the “the big build we’ve seen of PCs in anticipation of the Win 7 launch.”</p>
<p>That has triggered concerns that the PC industry has built too much inventory&#8211;and that it could result in both reduced component consumption in Q4 and beyond, and lower pricing for memory, which has benefited in recent weeks from higher NAND and DRAM prices.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2009/10/16/did-pc-makers-over-build-in-anticipation-of-windows-7/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091016/did-pc-makers-over-build-in-anticipation-of-windows-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Risks It All (Again)</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091015/intel-risks-it-all-again/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091015/intel-risks-it-all-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ellen McGirt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ellen McGirt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=16605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Paul Otellini, Intel's famously reserved CEO first heard the news, he got quiet.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Ellen McGirt, Contributor, Fast Company</p>
<p>When Paul Otellini, Intel&#8217;s (INTC) famously reserved CEO first heard the news, he got quiet. &#8220;The madder I get, the quieter I get,&#8221; he says, an important footnote for any Otellini user manual. He was hushed via press conference by Neelie Kroes, the European commissioner for competition.<br />
&#8220;Intel used illegal anticompetitive practices to exclude essentially its only competitor and thus reduce consumer choice in the worldwide market for x86 chips,&#8221; Kroes read last May from the 542-page decision on an antitrust case charging Intel with unfair trade practices.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/node/1401124/print">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091015/intel-risks-it-all-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Chip Veteran Passes the Baton to His Deputy</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091012/a-chip-veteran-passes-the-baton-to-his-deputy/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091012/a-chip-veteran-passes-the-baton-to-his-deputy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Halla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Macleod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Semiconductor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=16466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a 13-year run–marked by some dead ends–Brian Halla thinks he finally established a winning formula at National Semiconductor. So he’s stepping down.

Halla, 63, said Friday he will give up the CEO title at the chip maker on Nov. 30 to Donald Macleod, a 61-year-old Scot who has been at National since 1978 and was serving as president and chief operating officer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Don Clark, Reporter, The Wall Street Journal</p>
<p>After a 13-year run–marked by some dead ends–Brian Halla thinks he finally established a winning formula at National Semiconductor (NSM). So he’s stepping down.</p>
<p>Halla, 63, said Friday he will give up the CEO title at the chip maker on Nov. 30 to Donald Macleod, a 61-year-old Scot who has been at National since 1978 and was serving as president and chief operating officer. Halla said the appointment is fitting in view of Macleod’s contributions over the years at the company, which turns 50 this year. National is &#8220;the house that Donnie built,&#8221; Halla said.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/10/09/a-chip-veteran-passes-the-baton-to-his-deputy/?mod=rss_WSJBlog?mod=">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091012/a-chip-veteran-passes-the-baton-to-his-deputy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Apple Is Betting on Light Peak With Intel: A Love Story</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091008/why-apple-is-betting-on-light-peak-with-intel-a-love-story/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091008/why-apple-is-betting-on-light-peak-with-intel-a-love-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 07:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Eran Dilger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ARM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Eran Dilger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Light Peak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microchip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roughly Drafted Magazine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=16371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite Apple’s investments in developing its own custom ARM microchips in place of using Intel’s Atom mobile processors, the company has reached out to Intel as a partner to drive the adoption of the new Light Peak specification for optical cabling.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel Eran Dilger, Blogger, Roughly Drafted Magazine</p>
<p>Despite Apple’s (AAPL) investments in developing its own custom ARM microchips in place of using Intel’s (INTC) Atom mobile processors, the company has reached out to Intel as a partner to drive the adoption of the new Light Peak specification for optical cabling. A look at Apple’s historical use of ports explains why it is doing this.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/09/30/why-apple-is-betting-on-light-peak-with-intel-a-love-story/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091008/why-apple-is-betting-on-light-peak-with-intel-a-love-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New TI Factory Shows How the Chip World Has Changed</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090929/new-ti-factory-shows-how-the-chip-world-has-changed/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090929/new-ti-factory-shows-how-the-chip-world-has-changed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chip factory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silicon wafers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Instruments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=16013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was a big deal when Texas Instruments announced plans in 2003 for a massive chip factory in a suburb of Dallas, its home town. Six years later, the company is finally preparing for production there--under a strategy that has changed dramatically.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Don Clark, Reporter, The Wall Street Journal</p>
<p>It was a big deal when Texas Instruments (TXN) announced plans in 2003 for a massive chip factory in a suburb of Dallas, its home town. Six years later, the company is finally preparing for production there&#8211;under a strategy that has changed dramatically.</p>
<p>The company said Tuesday it expects to begin moving manufacturing equipment in October into the facility in Richardson known as RFAB, which has stood empty since the building’s shell was completed in 2006. Those machines will process silicon wafers that are 300 millimeters in diameter, which allows companies to churn out chips at the lowest per-unit cost.</p>
<p>That part fits the original plan. But instead of making advanced digital chips, RFAB will manufacture products based on analog technology&#8211;becoming the first 300-millimeter production line turning out such chips. (Others use 200-millimeter wafers).</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/09/29/new-ti-factory-shows-how-the-chip-world-has-changed/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090929/new-ti-factory-shows-how-the-chip-world-has-changed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chip Sales Get Q3 Boost From Inventory Restocking</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090929/chip-sales-get-q3-boost-from-inventory-restocking/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090929/chip-sales-get-q3-boost-from-inventory-restocking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Savitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barron's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chip revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Savitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inventory restocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iSuppli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Trader Daily]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=16010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Global chip revenues in the third quarter are getting a big boost from inventory restocking, according to the research firm iSuppli.

According to iSuppli, in the second quarter inventories dwindled to "lean, but appropriate levels," in a reversal of the excess inventory levels reached in 2008.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Eric Savitz, Blogger and Columnist, Barron&#8217;s, Tech Trader Daily</p>
<p>Global chip revenues in the third quarter are getting a big boost from inventory restocking, according to the research firm iSuppli.</p>
<p>According to iSuppli, in the second quarter inventories dwindled to &#8220;lean, but appropriate levels,&#8221; in a reversal of the excess inventory levels reached in 2008. In the third quarter, the research firm contends, suppliers have moved to build inventories in an attempt to reach a supply/demand balance. As a result, iSuppli contends, global chip revenues will likely by 3 percentage points above actual demand, &#8220;increasing an artificial bump in sales for the industry.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2009/09/29/chip-sales-get-q3-boost-from-inventory-restocking/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090929/chip-sales-get-q3-boost-from-inventory-restocking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD Gets at Least Brief Bragging Rights for Graphics Chip</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090929/amd-gets-at-least-brief-bragging-rights-for-graphics-chip/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090929/amd-gets-at-least-brief-bragging-rights-for-graphics-chip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATI Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circuitry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microprocessors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanometers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videogames]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=15992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hardware freaks flocked to San Francisco last week to hear Intel talk about microprocessors, the electronic brains in PCs. But Advanced Micro Devices made some pretty brainy claims of its own.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Don Clark, Reporter, The Wall Street Journal</p>
<p>Hardware freaks flocked to San Francisco last week to hear Intel (INTC) talk about microprocessors, the electronic brains in PCs. But Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) made some pretty brainy claims of its own.</p>
<p>The smaller Silicon Valley microprocessor maker expanded its focus several years ago by buying ATI Technologies, known for the chips called graphics processing units that generate realistic-looking scenery in videogames. AMD says the high-end GPU it announced last week sports a whopping 2.15 billion transistors.</p>
<p>That’s more features than any chip now for sale by Intel, which prides itself on packing the most tiny components on a given square of silicon. AMD used a production process at Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSM) that creates lines of circuitry measured at 40 nanometers, or billionths of a meter; that is a bit finer than the most advanced chips currently on the market from Intel, which have features rated at 45 nanometers.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/09/28/amd-gets-at-least-brief-bragging-rights-for-graphics-chip/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090929/amd-gets-at-least-brief-bragging-rights-for-graphics-chip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FSLR: Reiterates '09 View, Stock Down on Germany Woes</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090730/fslr-reiterates-09-view-stock-down-on-germany-woes/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090730/fslr-reiterates-09-view-stock-down-on-germany-woes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tiernan Ray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barron's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polysilicon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Trader Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiernan Ray]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=13935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shares of solar panel technology maker First Solar (FSLR) are reversing course this evening, falling to $170 after briefly going as high as $189 following a clean Q2 beat. What’s spooked people are the company’s remarks on a conference call this evening about growing uncertainty in its German market.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Tiernan Ray, Blogger, Barron&#8217;s, Tech Trader Daily</p>
<p>Shares of solar panel technology maker First Solar (FSLR) are reversing course this evening, falling to $170 after briefly going as high as $189 following a clean Q2 beat. What’s spooked people are the company’s remarks on a conference call this evening about growing uncertainty in its German market.</p>
<p>The company has seen increasing price-cuts among competitors selling into Germany’s solar power market. Although First Solar makes panels from a thin-film semiconductor technology, it started to see trouble in the German market from manufacturers hit with a glut of polysilicon-based product and slowing of new panel projects, said CEO Mike Ahern.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2009/07/30/first-solar-reiterates-09-outlook-stock-falls/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090730/fslr-reiterates-09-view-stock-down-on-germany-woes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SMI, UMC Dumped on Bullish Results; Whither TSMC?</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090729/smi-umc-dumped-on-bullish-results-whither-tsmc/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090729/smi-umc-dumped-on-bullish-results-whither-tsmc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tiernan Ray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barron's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiconductor Manufacturing International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Trader Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiernan Ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Microelectronics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=13889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There goes the rally in contract chip makers. Shanghai, China’s Semiconductor Manufacturing International and Taiwan’s United Microelectronics both this morning beat profit and sales estimates for their most recent quarters and forecast above consensus, but both saw shares punished nevertheless.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Tiernan Ray, Blogger, Barron&#8217;s, Tech Trader Daily</p>
<p>There goes the rally in contract chip makers. Shanghai, China’s Semiconductor Manufacturing International (SMI) and Taiwan’s United Microelectronics (UMC) both this morning beat profit and sales estimates for their most recent quarters and forecast above consensus, but both saw shares punished nevertheless.</p>
<p>SMI shares fell 21 cents, or 7.4 percent, to $2.64; UMC fell 15 cents, or 4.6 percent, to $3.15.</p>
<p>After a 61 percent rise in UMC stock this year and a 26 rise in SMI stock, I guess folks are selling on the news.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2009/07/29/smi-umc-dumped-on-bullish-results-whither-tsmc/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090729/smi-umc-dumped-on-bullish-results-whither-tsmc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>