<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Voices &#187; ACLU</title>
	<atom:link href="http://voices.allthingsd.com/tag/aclu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com</link>
	<description>from other Web sites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:30:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Expelled Student Sues Over "Unreasonable" Cell Phone Search</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090908/expelled-student-sues-over-unreasonable-cell-phone-search/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090908/expelled-student-sues-over-unreasonable-cell-phone-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 07:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacqui Cheng</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacqui Cheng]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southhaven]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=15059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A 12-year-old was expelled from school after having his cell phone confiscated and searched by authorities.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Jacqui Cheng, Associate Editor, Ars Technica</p>
<p>A 12-year-old was expelled from school after having his cell phone confiscated and searched by authorities. What did they find? Pictures of him dancing. Now, the ACLU has taken up the case, arguing that even students are protected from unreasonable search and seizure.</p>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/09/expelled-student-sues-over-unreasonable-cell-phone-search.ars">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090908/expelled-student-sues-over-unreasonable-cell-phone-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Town, Its Teens, and a Practice Called ‘Sexting’</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090421/a-town-its-teens-and-a-practice-called-%e2%80%98sexting%e2%80%99/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090421/a-town-its-teens-and-a-practice-called-%e2%80%98sexting%e2%80%99/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashby Jones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashby Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dionne Searcey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tunkhannock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=11059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let’s talk about sexting. As we’ve mentioned before, sexting is the practice of sending nude or semi-nude pictures of ones self or others via cell phone. It’s one thing, we suppose, if adults do it, but what’s got parents, students, school administrators, the ACLU and district attorneys riled up is that minors are getting into the act as well.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Ashby Jones, Lead Writer and Editor, Law Blog, The Wall Street Journal</p>
<p>Let’s talk about sexting. As we’ve mentioned before (click <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/03/25/does-teens-sending-nude-photos-of-themselves-constitute-a-crime/">here</a> and <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/03/31/federal-judge-issues-tro-in-teenagers-teen-porn-case/">here</a>), sexting is the practice of sending nude or semi-nude pictures of ones self or others via cell phone. It’s one thing, we suppose, if adults do it, but what’s got parents, students, school administrators, the ACLU and district attorneys riled up is that minors are getting into the act as well. The issue for prosecutors then becomes: should one charge “sexters” with serious crimes, like possession of child pornography, or handle such episodes in a less draconian manner.</p>
<p>The issue is nicely framed in a <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124026115528336397.html">WSJ story today</a> by Law Blog colleague Dionne Searcey, who shines the spotlight on a sexting kerfuffle that took place in a small Pennsylvania town called Tunkhannock. </p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/04/21/a-town-its-teens-and-a-practice-called-sexting/">Read the rest of this post on the Wall Street Journal&#8217;s Law Blog</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090421/a-town-its-teens-and-a-practice-called-%e2%80%98sexting%e2%80%99/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FBI Rescinds Secret Order for Internet Archive Records</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080508/broache-2/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080508/broache-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 07:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anne Broache</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Broache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brewster Kahle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Frontier Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security letter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080508/broache-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FBI has backed down on a secret request for information about a user of the Internet Archive digital library, thanks to a legal challenge from two prominent advocacy groups. The case, which was brought by the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of the archive, dates to last year but only became public on Wednesday. That's because the type of request involved, known as a national security letter, is accompanied by a gag order that forbids the recipient from disclosing its existence or discussing it with anyone except his attorneys, who are also gagged. As a result of a settlement, the FBI agreed to withdraw the national security letter and to lift the gag order.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Anne Broache, Staff Writer, CNET News.com</p>
<p>The FBI has backed down on a secret request for information about a user of the Internet Archive digital library, thanks to a legal challenge from two prominent advocacy groups. The case, which was brought by the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of the archive, dates to last year but only became public on Wednesday. That&#8217;s because the type of request involved, known as a national security letter, is accompanied by a gag order that forbids the recipient from disclosing its existence or discussing it with anyone except his attorneys, who are also gagged. As a result of a settlement, the FBI agreed to withdraw the national security letter and to lift the gag order.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9938603-7.html">Read the rest of this post</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080508/broache-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
