<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Voices &#187; Advertising Age</title>
	<atom:link href="http://voices.allthingsd.com/tag/advertising-age/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com</link>
	<description>from other Web sites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:01:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Gawker Destroyed Nikki Finke. So Why Doesn't It Matter?</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091110/gawker-destroyed-nikki-finke-so-why-doesnt-it-matter/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091110/gawker-destroyed-nikki-finke-so-why-doesnt-it-matter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Dumenco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deadline Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Cook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikki Finke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simon Dumenco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Media Guy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=17616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a few days, I waited for the other shoe to drop after Gawker's John Cook pretty much destroyed Deadline Hollywood blogger Nikki Finke.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Simon Dumenco, The Media Guy, Ad Age</p>
<p>For a few days, I waited for the other shoe to drop after Gawker&#8217;s John Cook pretty much destroyed Deadline Hollywood blogger Nikki Finke. Then I realized I was being an idiot&#8211;I was being naïve&#8211;in thinking it would matter. </p>
<p><a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=140347">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091110/gawker-destroyed-nikki-finke-so-why-doesnt-it-matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Want 5,000 More Facebook Friends? That'll Be $654.30.</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090903/want-5000-more-facebook-friends-thatll-be-65430/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090903/want-5000-more-facebook-friends-thatll-be-65430/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 07:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Learmonth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Learmonth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uSocial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=14979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you're a Gmail user who also happens to use Twitter, it's probably been about five minutes since you've seen an ad promising to boost your follower count.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Michael Learmonth, Senior Editor, Advertising Age</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a Gmail user who also happens to use Twitter, it&#8217;s probably been about five minutes since you&#8217;ve seen an ad promising to boost your follower count. The folks at online ad firm uSocial are taking that a step further: Pay them money and they&#8217;ll make you at least appear to be very big on Facebook.</p>
<p><a href="http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=138770">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090903/want-5000-more-facebook-friends-thatll-be-65430/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Happened to the Ad-Network Apocalypse?</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090828/what-happened-to-the-ad-network-apocalypse/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090828/what-happened-to-the-ad-network-apocalypse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Warren Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canaan Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consolidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decimation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Blodget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Lee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=14815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last September, Henry Blodget asked me and several other VCs on a panel--titled "Dot Bomb 2.0"--how many of the estimated 300 to 400 ad networks were "toast."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Warren Lee, Venture Partner, Canaan Partners</p>
<p>Last September, Henry Blodget asked me and several other VCs on a panel&#8211;titled &#8220;Dot Bomb 2.0&#8243;&#8211;how many of the estimated 300 to 400 ad networks were &#8220;toast.&#8221; (My personal view is that only 15 to 20 really matter.) Comments like &#8220;rampant consolidation&#8221; and &#8220;decimation&#8221; were used to describe the impending, inevitable shakeout that was sure to come.</p>
<p>Almost a year later, no apocalyptic shakeout has hit yet. So what happened? </p>
<p><a href="http://adage.com/digitalnext/post?article_id=138641">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090828/what-happened-to-the-ad-network-apocalypse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do Consumers Care About Web Privacy?</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090825/do-consumers-care-about-web-privacy/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090825/do-consumers-care-about-web-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Abbey Klaassen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abbey Klaassen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fetchback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opt-outs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy advocates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retargeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[targeting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=14686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Freaking out about the easier opt-outs proposed by some online-privacy advocates? Maybe you don't have so much to worry about.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Abbey Klaassen, Editor, Digital, Ad Age</p>
<p>Freaking out about the easier opt-outs proposed by some online-privacy advocates? Maybe you don&#8217;t have so much to worry about.</p>
<p>In June, Fetchback, an advertising network that specializes in ad &#8220;retargeting,&#8221; added a link within its ad units that, when clicked, took consumers to a page that explained who the advertiser was and how the ad got there and gave contact info for Fetchback, as well as a way to opt out of future targeting. </p>
<p><a href="http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=138599">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090825/do-consumers-care-about-web-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBS, Pepsi Create Video Ad to Run in Print</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090820/cbs-pepsi/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090820/cbs-pepsi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Steinberg </dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Steinberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Weekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pepsico Inc.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=14560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To hawk its fall season, CBS has teamed with PepsiCo and Entertainment Weekly to create a video ad that will run in the magazine.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Brian Steinberg , Television Editor, Advertising Age</p>
<p>To hawk its fall season, CBS (CBS) has teamed with PepsiCo (PEP) and Entertainment Weekly to create a video ad that will run in the magazine.</p>
<p><a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=138546">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090820/cbs-pepsi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blip.tv Brings Programs to YouTube, Ads to "Channel Awesome"</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090729/bliptv-brings-programs-to-youtube-ads-to-channel-awesome/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090729/bliptv-brings-programs-to-youtube-ads-to-channel-awesome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Learmonth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blip.tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Channel Awesome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Learmonth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=13849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What does the TV network of the future look like? A version of it is coming into focus at New York-based startup blip.tv.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Michael Learmonth, Reporter, Ad Age</p>
<p>What does the TV network of the future look like? A version of it is coming into focus at New York-based startup blip.tv.</p>
<p><a href="http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=138164">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090729/bliptv-brings-programs-to-youtube-ads-to-channel-awesome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advertising Will Change Forever</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090722/advertising-will-change-forever/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090722/advertising-will-change-forever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator> Josh Bernoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forrester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Bernoff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=13668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's one of the things we do at Forrester Research: we interview as many marketers as we can about their plans, identify trends and project future likely conditions, and then we put together some numbers to make a projection. If you've ever seen a Forrester projection, it comes from a process like this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By  Josh Bernoff, Principal Analyst, Forrester Research</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s one of the things we do at Forrester Research (FORR): we interview as many marketers as we can about their plans, identify trends and project future likely conditions, and then we put together some numbers to make a projection. If you&#8217;ve ever seen a Forrester projection, it comes from a process like this.</p>
<p><a href="http://adage.com/digitalnext/article?article_id=138023">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090722/advertising-will-change-forever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Generates $48 Million of Media Coverage in a Month</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090721/twitter-generates-48-million-of-media-coverage-in-a-month/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090721/twitter-generates-48-million-of-media-coverage-in-a-month/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 07:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Abbey Klaassen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abbey Klaassen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daytime talk shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper reporters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=13640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter's been the toast of TV news programs, daytime talk shows, magazine editors and newspaper reporters. But what's all that chatter worth?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Abbey Klaassen, Editor, Digital, Ad Age</p>
<p>Twitter&#8217;s been the toast of TV news programs, daytime talk shows, magazine editors and newspaper reporters. But what&#8217;s all that chatter worth?</p>
<p>According to news-monitoring service VMS, a cool $48 million over the past 30 days.<br />
<a href="http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=138004"><br />
Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090721/twitter-generates-48-million-of-media-coverage-in-a-month/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Looks to Campuses for "Cloud" Converts</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090720/google-looks-to-campuses-for-cloud-converts/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090720/google-looks-to-campuses-for-cloud-converts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Learmonth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Docs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Learmonth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[universities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=13606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google's got a not-so-secret weapon in its bid to convert the world to applications such as Gmail, Google Docs, Google Talk, Google Sites and, soon, Google's Chrome operating system: the 17 million college students on more than 4,000 campuses across the country.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Michael Learmonth, Senior Editor, Advertising Age</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s (GOOG) got a not-so-secret weapon in its bid to convert the world to applications such as Gmail, Google Docs, Google Talk, Google Sites and, soon, Google&#8217;s Chrome operating system: the 17 million college students on more than 4,000 campuses across the country. </p>
<p>For more than two years, Google has approached colleges and universities with a near-unbeatable offer: provide unlimited hosted e-mail and other applications, all branded by the institution and delivered free of charge. </p>
<p><a href="http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=137995">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090720/google-looks-to-campuses-for-cloud-converts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Sank Veoh and Joost? Too Much Cash Too Soon.</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090716/what-sank-veoh-and-joost-too-much-cash-too-soon/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090716/what-sank-veoh-and-joost-too-much-cash-too-soon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 07:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Warren Lee </dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veoh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=13526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the past few months, two of the highest-profile and most heavily-funded online-video startups--Veoh and Joost--have given up trying to compete with Hulu and YouTube and have now drastically switched their business models in hopes of surviving.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Warren Lee , Contributing Writer, Advertising Age</p>
<p>In the past few months, two of the highest-profile and most heavily-funded online-video startups&#8211;Veoh and Joost&#8211;have given up trying to compete with Hulu and YouTube and have now drastically switched their business models in hopes of surviving.</p>
<p><a href="http://adage.com/digitalnext/article?article_id=137944">Read the rest of this post</a></p>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090716/what-sank-veoh-and-joost-too-much-cash-too-soon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Get-Rich-Quick Ads Steal Google's Brand Equity</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090629/how-get-rich-quick-ads-steal-googles-brand-equity/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090629/how-get-rich-quick-ads-steal-googles-brand-equity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Learmonth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Learmonth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales pitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=12990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a world of double-digit unemployment and old-line industries in mid-collapse, here's a sales pitch tailor-made for the times: "Get Paid by Google."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Michael Learmonth, Senior Editor, Advertising Age</p>
<p>In a world of double-digit unemployment and old-line industries in mid-collapse, here&#8217;s a sales pitch tailor-made for the times: &#8220;Get Paid by Google&#8221; (GOOG).</p>
<p><a href="http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=137587">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090629/how-get-rich-quick-ads-steal-googles-brand-equity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Alice.com Lure CPG Players Back to E-commerce?</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090624/can-alicecom-lure-cpg-players-back-to-e-commerce/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090624/can-alicecom-lure-cpg-players-back-to-e-commerce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 07:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Neff </dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=12904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Package-goods marketers tried--and largely rejected--e-commerce about a decade ago. But their interest has rekindled lately, and a novel start-up named Alice.com is betting they're ready to party again like it's 1999.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Jack Neff , Editor at Large, Advertising Age</p>
<p> Package-goods marketers tried &#8212; and largely rejected &#8212; e-commerce about a decade ago. But their interest has rekindled lately, and a novel start-up named Alice.com is betting they&#8217;re ready to party again like it&#8217;s 1999.</p>
<p><a href="http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=137500">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090624/can-alicecom-lure-cpg-players-back-to-e-commerce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gawker Chief: 'Original Reporting Will Be Rewarded'</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090521/gawker-chief-original-reporting-will-be-rewarded/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090521/gawker-chief-original-reporting-will-be-rewarded/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 07:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Learmonth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cassandras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Learmonth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Denton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=11971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gawker Media impresario Nick Denton, one of the more vocal Cassandras of media collapse last fall, got a surprise this spring when things turned out to be, well, not so bad.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Michael Learmonth, Senior Editor, Advertising Age</p>
<p>Gawker Media impresario Nick Denton, one of the more vocal Cassandras of media collapse last fall, got a surprise this spring when things turned out to be, well, not so bad. Mr. Denton told us earlier in the year that sales were actually up double digits, and it appeared marketers&#8217; reactions to the recession were &#8220;more strategic&#8221; than he thought.</p>
<p><a href="http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=136776">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090521/gawker-chief-original-reporting-will-be-rewarded/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why People Won't Pay for Online News the Way They Pay for HBO</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090514/why-people-wont-pay-for-online-news-the-way-they-pay-for-hbo/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090514/why-people-wont-pay-for-online-news-the-way-they-pay-for-hbo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 07:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nat Ives</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Rich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nat Ives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=11792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In The New York Times last Sunday, Frank Rich became the latest to argue that cable- and satellite-TV subscriptions should give hope to the newspaper industry, which has decided during this steep ad downturn that it wants to charge for some content it puts online.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Nat Ives, Media Reporter, Advertising Age</p>
<p>In The New York Times (NYT) last Sunday, Frank Rich became the latest to argue that cable- and satellite-TV subscriptions should give hope to the newspaper industry, which has decided during this steep ad downturn that it wants to charge for some content it puts online.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s all a matter of priorities,&#8221; Mr. Rich wrote. &#8220;Not long ago, we laughed at the idea of pay TV.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=136616">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090514/why-people-wont-pay-for-online-news-the-way-they-pay-for-hbo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newspapers Build Digital Portfolios</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090505/newspapers-build-digital-portfolios/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090505/newspapers-build-digital-portfolios/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 07:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Learmonth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Learmonth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=11433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Myth: newspapers stuck their heads in the sand and just hoped the internet would go away.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Michael Learmonth, Reporter, Ad Age</p>
<p>Myth: newspapers stuck their heads in the sand and just hoped the internet would go away.</p>
<p>Reality: Newspapers took some of the biggest, earliest swings on the web, most turned out to be misses, and then got steamrolled by Google (GOOG) just like everyone else. </p>
<p><a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=136416">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090505/newspapers-build-digital-portfolios/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
