In case you hadn’t noticed: Apple (AAPL) shares today touched $190 for the first time since Jan. 4.
The stock has now recovered almost all of its entire massive decline from $198 at year-end to an intra-day low at $115.44 on Feb. 26. That’s a rally of nearly 65% off the lows, which is not too shabby.
One of the most obvious takeaways from Microsoft’s pending multibillion- dollar bid for Yahoo is that the always-connected world is a lot more complicated place for the boys from Redmond to navigate than the quaint old world of desktop office applications. Inherent in the bid is an admission that Microsoft has failed, despite billions of dollars of investment, to gain significant traction in online search and advertising. So now it’s trying to buy its way in, targeting the only company that’s had any substantial success competing with Google in search.
So, according to a variety of newspaper accounts, Yahoo is going to flat out reject Microsoft’s $31-a-share takeover bid, and assert that the company is worth a lot more–as much as $40 a share. So what happens now?
I’ve come across a second Street research note addressing the status of Apple’s production plans.
Yesterday, as I am sure you will recall, I wrote a post about a note by Friedman Billings Ramsey analyst Craig Berger, who said that he had learned that Apple had recently increased its productions plans for the iMac, while reducing orders for iPods and iPhones. Some people criticized the findings, noting that there were several potential explanations. One theory: the company is slowing production of older models in preparation for new models.
Let’s dive in a little more into the issues around Cisco’s disappointing guidance for its fiscal third quarter ending in April.
In a brief interview with Tech Trader Daily late this afternoon, I got a few more details on the situation from Ned Hooper, Cisco’s senior VP for corporate development and consumer and small business.
This is a section of the All Things Digital Web site featuring posts from around the Web, from other Dow Jones properties and also original pieces we solicit. The section is now explicitly labeled that it comes "from other Web sites."
We are fully aware of the controversies around how linking and aggregating is done on the Web and we, in no way, are attempting to "scrape" original content created by others. Instead, regarding third-party posts, we are trying to point readers of this site to other posts from around the Web that we admire and are trying to do so in the quickest manner possible.
The Internet is full of terrific content that is not ours and we want to help our readers find it by making editorial suggestions--Look, Mom, no algorithm!--of posts we think are worth their time.
That is why we have made even more changes to Voices to ensure we do this in the most transparent and timely way. While we don't expect that everyone will agree with our policies, we have made changes that reflect our intent in pointing to content outside our site.
Because the site is wholly owned by Dow Jones, publisher of The Wall Street Journal, we aim to adhere to the journalistic standards of the best of the mainstream media. But, because it is run autonomously as a small online startup, we aim to exhibit the fresh thinking and nimbleness of the best of the new media. We want to be first, and sassy, but also well sourced and accurate. We will offer lots of opinion and analysis, but plenty of fact as well.