<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Voices &#187; click</title>
	<atom:link href="http://voices.allthingsd.com/tag/click/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com</link>
	<description>from other Web sites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:20:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Should Cameras Be Required to Click?</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090127/should-cameras-be-required-to-click/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090127/should-cameras-be-required-to-click/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew LaVallee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adolescents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew LaVallee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera Phone Predator Alert Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphone cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[click]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=7978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bill forcing cellphone cameras to make a sound when taking shots has been introduced in Congress, with its sponsor citing voyeuristic and exploitative picture-taking as the reason behind it.
The Camera Phone Predator Alert Act would require camera-phone manufacturers to include an audible "click" or other sound when the device takes a photo.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Andrew LaVallee, Reporter, The Wall Street Journal</p>
<p>A bill forcing cellphone cameras to make a sound when taking shots has been introduced in Congress, with its sponsor citing voyeuristic and exploitative picture-taking as the reason behind it.</p>
<p>The Camera Phone Predator Alert Act would require camera-phone manufacturers to include an audible &#8220;click&#8221; or other sound when the device takes a photo. That sound won&#8217;t be able to be disabled or silenced, according to the draft of the bill.</p>
<p>&#8220;Congress finds that children and adolescents have been exploited by photographs taken in dressing rooms and public places with the use of a camera phone,&#8221; the draft says.<br />
<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/01/27/should-cameras-be-required-to-click/"><br />
Read the rest of the post</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090127/should-cameras-be-required-to-click/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook and Privacy</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080502/facebook-and-privacy/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080502/facebook-and-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 07:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rory Cellan-Jones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[click]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dot.life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rory Cellan-Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080502/facebook-and-privacy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How worried are you about the amount of private and personal stuff you have posted on social-networking sites? I've always been pretty relaxed--both because I'm very careful about how much information I give away, and because I think I know my way around privacy settings.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Rory Cellan-Jones, Technology Correspondent, BBC</p>
<p>How worried are you about the amount of private and personal stuff you have posted on social-networking sites? I&#8217;ve always been pretty relaxed&#8211;both because I&#8217;m very careful about how much information I give away, and because I think I know my way around privacy settings.</p>
<p>But an investigation by my colleagues at Click has made me think again. They set out to explore just how much data is accessible to developers who make applications for Facebook. What they found was that it was relatively simple to write an application that would give the developer access to lots of personal data&#8211;not just from those who&#8217;ve installed that application, but also from their list of Facebook friends.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/technology/2008/05/facebook_and_privacy.html">Read the rest of this post</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080502/facebook-and-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mid-March '08 Blogging</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080319/mid-march-08-blogging/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080319/mid-march-08-blogging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 07:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Canter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[click]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Canter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social network]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080319/mid-march-08-blogging/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When is a social network NOT a social network? When it's part of Ning’s 200,000 social networks! Give me a break, Gina and Marc! STOP bragging about how many people have clicked and created a network. How come you have NEVER posted anything on: how many networks have five or more people in them? How 'bout 50 people in them? Or 500 people? Bragging about 200,000 networks with one person in them is absurd. And I don't even care if they're porno networks or not! But they're NOT networks if there are less than what? Five? 10? 25 in them? You're obviously pimping yourself up for a sale. Give us all a break--please!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Marc Canter, Blogger, Marc&#8217;s Voice</p>
<p>When is a social network NOT a social network? When it&#8217;s part of Ning&#8217;s 200,000 social networks! Give me a break, Gina and Marc! STOP bragging about how many people have clicked and created a network. How come you have NEVER posted anything on: how many networks have five or more people in them? How &#8217;bout 50 people in them? Or 500 people? Bragging about 200,000 networks with one person in them is absurd. And I don&#8217;t even care if they&#8217;re porno networks or not! But they&#8217;re NOT networks if there are less than what? Five? 10? 25 in them? You&#8217;re obviously pimping yourself up for a sale. Give us all a break&#8211;please!</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2008/03/mid-march-08-blogging">Read the rest of this post</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080319/mid-march-08-blogging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Do They Track You? Let Us Count the Ways</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080310/how-do-they-track-you-let-us-count-the-ways/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080310/how-do-they-track-you-let-us-count-the-ways/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Louise Story</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[click]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comScore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louise Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080310/how-do-they-track-you-let-us-count-the-ways/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my article in Monday's Times, "To Aim Ads, Web Is Keeping Closer Eye on What You Click," I worked with comScore to develop a new measure for Web companies: how much data they can collect from users.

On the Internet, companies are typically ranked by how many different people visit their sites in a given month. And when Microsoft announced its $41 billion bid for Yahoo, comScore and Nielsen Online promptly put out estimates counting how many people would be in the merged company's total audience.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Louise Story, Staff Writer, New York Times</p>
<p>In my article in Monday&#8217;s Times, &#8220;To Aim Ads, Web Is Keeping Closer Eye on What You Click,&#8221; I worked with comScore to develop a new measure for Web companies: how much data they can collect from users.</p>
<p>On the Internet, companies are typically ranked by how many different people visit their sites in a given month. And when Microsoft announced its $41 billion bid for Yahoo, comScore and Nielsen Online promptly put out estimates counting how many people would be in the merged company&#8217;s total audience.</p>
<p><a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/how-do-they-track-you-let-us-count-the-ways/">Read the rest of this post</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080310/how-do-they-track-you-let-us-count-the-ways/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sorry, but "Accidental Click" Reduction Isn't Google's Problem</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080229/blodget-3/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080229/blodget-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henry Blodget</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accidental click]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[click]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comScore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Blodget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Alley Insider]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080229/blodget-3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the world recovers from the comScore report that floored Google's stock two days ago, a theory is gaining steam that the whole click problem can be attributed to Google's "accidental click reduction" program. Google may not be as badly off as the comScore report suggests, but the accidental-click theory is flat-out wrong.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Henry Blodget, Blogger, Silicon Alley Insider</p>
<p>As the world recovers from the comScore report that floored Google&#8217;s stock two days ago, a theory is gaining steam that the whole click problem can be attributed to Google&#8217;s &#8220;accidental click reduction&#8221; program. Google may not be as badly off as the comScore report suggests, but the accidental-click theory is flat-out wrong.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/2/sorry__but__accidental_click__reduction_isn_t_google_s_problem">Read the rest of this post</a></p>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080229/blodget-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
