<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Voices &#187; GigaOm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://voices.allthingsd.com/tag/gigaom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com</link>
	<description>from other Web sites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:09:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How Video Is Changing the Internet</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091124/how-video-is-changing-the-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091124/how-video-is-changing-the-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbor Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Bennett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tier-1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=18327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rise of video streaming is dramatically affecting the Internet, according to a two-year study of Internet traffic trends that Arbor Networks recently presented to the North American Network Operators Group.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Richard Bennett, Contributor, GigaOM</p>
<p>The rise of video streaming is dramatically affecting the Internet, according to a two-year study of Internet traffic trends that Arbor Networks recently presented to the North American Network Operators Group. Two years ago, Internet traffic was distributed evenly among a dozen Tier-1 network providers, but today the majority of traffic flows through direct peering agreements among large content providers, content delivery networks and ISPs. </p>
<p>Consequently, Tier-1 networks have shifted their business models from simple packet delivery to richer cloud computing and content hosting services, and new players Google (GOOG) and Comcast (CMCSA) have joined the top 10 list of Internet traffic producers&#8211;and the more traffic they put on the Internet, the more control it gives them over your online experience.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/11/22/how-video-is-changing-the-internet/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091124/how-video-is-changing-the-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Really, Peek? We Need a Dedicated Twitter Device?</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091104/really-peek-we-need-a-dedicated-twitter-device/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091104/really-peek-we-need-a-dedicated-twitter-device/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Gibbs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Gibbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=17399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those who thought its email-only device targeted too broad a market, Peek Inc. has gone even more niche--and more absurd--with the first mobile device dedicated entirely to Twitter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Colin Gibbs, Contributor, GigaOm</p>
<p>For those who thought its email-only device targeted too broad a market, Peek Inc. has gone even more niche&#8211;and more absurd&#8211;with the first mobile device dedicated entirely to Twitter. TwitterPeek, as the gadget is branded, enables users to read and send tweets, reply, retweet and send direct messages on the go. The device sells for $99 plus an $8 monthly fee or $200 for a lifetime of service.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/11/03/really-peek-we-need-a-dedicated-twitter-device/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091104/really-peek-we-need-a-dedicated-twitter-device/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There Really Might Be a Google Phone. No, Seriously!</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091021/there-really-might-be-a-google-phone-no-seriously/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091021/there-really-might-be-a-google-phone-no-seriously/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=16849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We’ve gone back and forth on the existence of a Google phone for a long time now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Om Malik, Founder and Senior Writer, GigaOm</p>
<p>We’ve gone back and forth on the existence of a Google (GOOG) phone for a long time now. In the beginning, there was a talk of a Google Phone that turned out to be Android, Google’s mobile operating system targeting handset makers such as HTC (HTC), Motorola (MOT) and Samsung. Now there is word that Google might actually be looking to make its own handset.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/10/20/real-google-phone/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091021/there-really-might-be-a-google-phone-no-seriously/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 to Usher in Profitless Prosperity</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091007/windows-7-to-usher-in-profitless-prosperity/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091007/windows-7-to-usher-in-profitless-prosperity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 07:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian Rupley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit margins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sebastian Rupley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=16303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ultra-low prices on portable computers are nothing new, and in fact have increasingly become the norm since the debut of netbooks--small and light ultraportables that are virtually defined by their low cost.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Sebastian Rupley, Contributor, GigaOm</p>
<p>Ultra-low prices on portable computers are nothing new, and in fact have increasingly become the norm since the debut of netbooks&#8211;small and light ultraportables that are virtually defined by their low cost. However, there are some strong reasons to believe that Microsoft’s (MSFT) upcoming Windows 7 operating system, in addition to new types of Linux-based portables, could help drive profit margins for hardware manufacturers to surprising new bottoms.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/10/06/windows-7-to-usher-in-profitless-prosperity/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091007/windows-7-to-usher-in-profitless-prosperity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Tech Mergers May End Up Hurting the Web</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091005/why-tech-mergers-may-end-up-hurting-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091005/why-tech-mergers-may-end-up-hurting-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 07:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Kelleher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Kelleher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Omniture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xerox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=16191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Suddenly, it’s mating season in the tech sector.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Kevin Kelleher, Blogger, GigaOm</p>
<p>Suddenly, it’s mating season in the tech sector. Xerox (XRX) is paying $6.4 billion for a piece of the cloud, Adobe (ADBE) is hooking up with Omniture (OMTR) and Intuit (INTU) with Mint, and that may just be the start. As Om pointed out, this is good news for startups and entrepreneurs, especially those with money tied up in late-stage investments that aren’t likely to go public soon.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/10/03/why-tech-mergers-may-end-up-hurting-the-web/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091005/why-tech-mergers-may-end-up-hurting-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Big Is the Apple iPhone App Economy? The Answer Might Surprise You.</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090828/how-big-is-the-apple-iphone-app-economy-the-answer-might-surprise-you/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090828/how-big-is-the-apple-iphone-app-economy-the-answer-might-surprise-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[App Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=14823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I were to tell you that Apple’s app economy was worth more than $2.5 $2.4 billion a year, you would laugh hysterically, shake your head and walk out of the room, yes?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Om Malik, Founder and Senior Writer, GigaOm</p>
<p>If I were to tell you that Apple’s (AAPL) app economy was worth more than <del datetime="2009-08-28T04:43:05+00:00">$2.5</del> $2.4 billion a year, you would laugh hysterically, shake your head and walk out of the room, yes? Surf on over to some other web site? But here I am telling you exactly that!</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/08/27/how-big-is-apple-iphone-app-economy-the-answer-might-surprise-you/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090828/how-big-is-the-apple-iphone-app-economy-the-answer-might-surprise-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dunbar's Number and the Future of Communications</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090824/dunbars-number-and-the-future-of-communications/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090824/dunbars-number-and-the-future-of-communications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Speiser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Speiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sutter Hill Ventures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=14654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past year, I’ve wished more of my friends “Happy Birthday” than I had my entire life prior to that.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Mike Speiser, Managing Director, Sutter Hill Ventures</p>
<p>Over the past year, I’ve wished more of my friends “Happy Birthday” than I had my entire life prior to that. This summer, I’ve checked in daily with numerous friends while they were on their vacations. And last week I accidentally ignited a debate among 16 of my friends over the article “Why Exercise Won’t Make You Thin.”</p>
<p>Of course, none of this happened in person, but via Facebook and Twitter. </p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/08/23/dunbars-number-and-the-future-of-communications/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090824/dunbars-number-and-the-future-of-communications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Evolution of Blogging</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090817/the-evolution-of-blogging/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090817/the-evolution-of-blogging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activity streams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Winer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[river of news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RSS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=14427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave Winer’s ability to peer into the future is uncanny.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Om Malik, Founder and Senior Writer, GigaOM</p>
<p>Dave Winer’s ability to peer into the future is uncanny. He was talking about a river of news long before the current activity streams became popular. He was evangelizing RSS long before there were blogs. I could go on and on about his prescient observations, but it’s his warnings that are especially prophetic.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/08/13/the-evolution-of-blogging/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090817/the-evolution-of-blogging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The GigaOM Interview: FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090805/the-gigaom-interview-fcc-chairman-julius-genachowski/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090805/the-gigaom-interview-fcc-chairman-julius-genachowski/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 07:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julius Genachowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=14048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Late last week, a day before the Federal Communications Commission started to investigate the Google Voice App fiasco, I spoke with the new FCC chairman, Julius Genachowski. He managed to carve out a few minutes from what has been a very busy first month on the job.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Om Malik, Founder and Senior Writer, GigaOM</p>
<p>Late last week, a day before the Federal Communications Commission started to investigate the Google (GOOG) Voice App fiasco, I spoke with the new FCC chairman, Julius Genachowski. He managed to carve out a few minutes from what has been a very busy first month on the job.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/08/03/the-gigaom-interview-fcc-chair-julius-genachowski/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090805/the-gigaom-interview-fcc-chairman-julius-genachowski/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The State of Wireless Broadband: 225 Million Subscribers &amp; Growing</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090723/the-state-of-wireless-broadband-225m-subscribers-growing/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090723/the-state-of-wireless-broadband-225m-subscribers-growing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 07:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=13715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know that in a few years, Long Term Evolution (LTE), the 4G wireless broadband technology being embraced by mobile carriers across the world, is going to rule the airwaves, becoming an important way for us to connect to the Internet. But for now, it seems HSPA, aka High Speed Packet Access, the 3G wireless broadband technology, rules the planet. HSPA is a common term used to embrace all acronyms for HSDPA and HSUPA as well as HSPA+.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Om Malik, Founder and Senior Writer, GigaOM</p>
<p>We all know that in a few years, Long Term Evolution (LTE), the 4G wireless broadband technology being embraced by mobile carriers across the world, is going to rule the airwaves, becoming an important way for us to connect to the Internet. But for now, it seems HSPA, aka High Speed Packet Access, the 3G wireless broadband technology, rules the planet. HSPA is a common term used to embrace all acronyms for HSDPA and HSUPA as well as HSPA+.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/07/21/for-now-hspa-rules-the-wireless-broadband/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090723/the-state-of-wireless-broadband-225m-subscribers-growing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spinning the Web: P.R. In Silicon Valley</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090706/spinning-the-web-pr-in-silicon-valley/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090706/spinning-the-web-pr-in-silicon-valley/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 07:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Claire Cain Miller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Things Digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brooke Hammerling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claire Cain Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erin McKean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechCrunch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordnik]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=13247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brooke Hammerling (publicist) and Erin McKean (entrepreneur) are in a Sand Hill Road conference room, hashing out plans to unveil Ms. McKean’s new Web site, Wordnik.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Claire Cain Miller, Staff Writer, New York Times</p>
<p>Brooke Hammerling (publicist) and Erin McKean (entrepreneur) are in a Sand Hill Road conference room, hashing out plans to unveil Ms. McKean’s new Web site, Wordnik.</p>
<p>Ms. Hammerling, while popping green apple Jolly Ranchers into her mouth, suggests a press tour that includes briefing bloggers at influential geek sites like TechCrunch, All Things Digital and GigaOM.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/05/business/05pr.html?_r=1">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090706/spinning-the-web-pr-in-silicon-valley/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For Firefox, a Challenging Future Awaits</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090706/for-firefox-a-challenging-future-awaits/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090706/for-firefox-a-challenging-future-awaits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 07:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netscape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=13239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For much of this decade, Mozilla and its Firefox browser were the upstarts, out to beat the big, bad Microsoft and its Internet Explorer browser.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Om Malik, Founder, Senior Writer, GigaOmniMedia</p>
<p>For much of this decade, Mozilla and its Firefox browser were the upstarts, out to beat the big, bad Microsoft (MSFT) and its Internet Explorer browser. Firefox, the descendant of Netscape, the browser that helped jump-start the web revolution, was nimble and it was secure&#8211;something Microsoft&#8217;s IE wasn&#8217;t.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/07/05/for-firefox-a-challenging-future-awaits/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090706/for-firefox-a-challenging-future-awaits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Twitter Become the New Casual Gaming Hub?</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090624/can-twitter-become-the-new-casual-gaming-hub/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090624/can-twitter-become-the-new-casual-gaming-hub/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[casual gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micro-messaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spymaster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=12910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the growing number of games being played on it are any indication, then San Francisco-based micro-messaging service Twitter has the potential to become the next major casual gaming hub.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Om Malik, Founder, Senior Writer, GigaOmniMedia</p>
<p>If the growing number of games being played on it are any indication, then San Francisco-based micro-messaging service Twitter has the potential to become the next major casual gaming hub. The thought first came to me a few weeks ago, when I discovered Spymaster, a game that allows you to run your own spy ring. </p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/06/23/can-twitter-become-the-new-casual-gaming-hub/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090624/can-twitter-become-the-new-casual-gaming-hub/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dr. Jekyll, Mr. Hyde and Privacy on the Web</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090622/dr-jekyll-mr-hyde-and-privacy-on-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090622/dr-jekyll-mr-hyde-and-privacy-on-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Kelleher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jekyll and Hyde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Kelleher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netscape]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=12852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever since Netscape started storing cookies in its browsers, there has been a Jekyll-and-Hyde nature to the web. The Jekyll web promised a more personalized experience, with sites serving ads for products and services that you would actually be interested in--ads that are more like useful information and less like glaring interruptions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Kevin Kelleher, Contributing Writer, GigaOm</p>
<p>Ever since Netscape started storing cookies in its browsers, there has been a Jekyll-and-Hyde nature to the web. The Jekyll web promised a more personalized experience, with sites serving ads for products and services that you would actually be interested in&#8211;ads that are more like useful information and less like glaring interruptions. The Hyde web wanted sites to stalk you, recording little bits of data about your online life until they knew more than you’d be comfortable sharing even with some friends.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/06/20/dr-jekyll-mr-hyde-and-privacy-on-the-web/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090622/dr-jekyll-mr-hyde-and-privacy-on-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-Books Are Hot, So Why Did E-Ink Sell for So Little?</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090602/e-books-are-hot-so-why-did-e-ink-sell-for-so-little/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090602/e-books-are-hot-so-why-did-e-ink-sell-for-so-little/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 09:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital ink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E Ink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prime View International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PVI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=12265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prime View International, a Taiwanese company that makes an e-readers display part, said today it would purchase E-Ink, a company that provides the digital ink technology in the Amazon Kindle and Sony Reader, for $215 million.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Stacey Higginbotham, Editor, GigaOm</p>
<p>Prime View International, a Taiwanese company that makes an e-readers display part, said today it would purchase E-Ink, a company that provides the digital ink technology in the Amazon Kindle and Sony Reader, for $215 million. The two companies have been partners in developing the Sony and Amazon e-reader products, and the deal highlights PVI’s attempt to own the top provider of an essential technology for the growing e-reader market.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/06/01/e-books-are-hot-so-why-did-e-ink-sell-for-so-little/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090602/e-books-are-hot-so-why-did-e-ink-sell-for-so-little/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>