by Tiernan Ray, Blogger, Barron's, Tech Trader Daily
This Wednesday, Aug. 20, Salesforce.com (CRM), which vends a customer relations management tool as a Web-based application, is expected to report financial results for the July-ending second Quarter, after the bell. Two analysts take divergent approaches in their outlook for Salesforce in reports this morning.
by Evan Newmark, Writer, Wall Street Journal Online, Deal Journal
If you are a believer in efficient markets, every now and then a hot tech stock comes along that pushes your conviction to its limits.
VMware was bought for $625 million by EMC in 2004, went public in 2007 and soon hit a market cap of $48 billion. It currently trades at about a quarter of that value.
Even the hottest stock can’t defy gravity indefinitely. Or can it?
Salesforce.com (CRM) shares are trading lower after Citigroup’s Brent Thill this morning cut his rating on the stock to Hold from Buy on a valuation basis.
Thill notes that he sees no cracks in the company’s fundamentals, and that the stock has held up well given the weakening economy and difficult equity market.
The Internet revolutionized the distribution of software–perhaps a bit too much. The Web brought a new, cheaper method for getting software into the hands of users, but in doing so may have killed one of the best models in Silicon Valley history.
by Eric Savitz, Blogger and Columnist, Tech Trader Daily, Barron's
Salesforce.com (CRM) is the thing you’ve been waiting for: a play on Web 3.0. At least, that’s the way Jefferies & Co.’s Ross MacMillan sees it. He raised his rating on the stock today to Buy from Hold, and upped his price target to $77 from $49. The move comes one day after the company reported better-than-expected results for its fiscal first quarter ended April.
MacMillan contends that the company is morphing from the leader in on-demand CRM software to “a major provider of cloud computer infrastructure.” (Which is to say, Web 3.0.)
This is a section of the All Things Digital Web site featuring posts from around the Web, from other Dow Jones properties and also original pieces we solicit. The section is now explicitly labeled that it comes "from other Web sites."
We are fully aware of the controversies around how linking and aggregating is done on the Web and we, in no way, are attempting to "scrape" original content created by others. Instead, regarding third-party posts, we are trying to point readers of this site to other posts from around the Web that we admire and are trying to do so in the quickest manner possible.
The Internet is full of terrific content that is not ours and we want to help our readers find it by making editorial suggestions--Look, Mom, no algorithm!--of posts we think are worth their time.
That is why we have made even more changes to Voices to ensure we do this in the most transparent and timely way. While we don't expect that everyone will agree with our policies, we have made changes that reflect our intent in pointing to content outside our site.
Because the site is wholly owned by Dow Jones, publisher of The Wall Street Journal, we aim to adhere to the journalistic standards of the best of the mainstream media. But, because it is run autonomously as a small online startup, we aim to exhibit the fresh thinking and nimbleness of the best of the new media. We want to be first, and sassy, but also well sourced and accurate. We will offer lots of opinion and analysis, but plenty of fact as well.