<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Voices &#187; Stacey Higginbotham</title>
	<atom:link href="http://voices.allthingsd.com/tag/stacey-higginbotham/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com</link>
	<description>from other Web sites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:27:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>E-Books Are Hot, So Why Did E-Ink Sell for So Little?</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090602/e-books-are-hot-so-why-did-e-ink-sell-for-so-little/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090602/e-books-are-hot-so-why-did-e-ink-sell-for-so-little/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 09:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital ink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E Ink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prime View International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PVI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=12265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prime View International, a Taiwanese company that makes an e-readers display part, said today it would purchase E-Ink, a company that provides the digital ink technology in the Amazon Kindle and Sony Reader, for $215 million.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Stacey Higginbotham, Editor, GigaOm</p>
<p>Prime View International, a Taiwanese company that makes an e-readers display part, said today it would purchase E-Ink, a company that provides the digital ink technology in the Amazon Kindle and Sony Reader, for $215 million. The two companies have been partners in developing the Sony and Amazon e-reader products, and the deal highlights PVI’s attempt to own the top provider of an essential technology for the growing e-reader market.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/06/01/e-books-are-hot-so-why-did-e-ink-sell-for-so-little/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090602/e-books-are-hot-so-why-did-e-ink-sell-for-so-little/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why We Don't Believe Rumors of an Apple/Verizon Love Child</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090429/why-we-dont-believe-rumors-of-an-appleverizon-love-child/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090429/why-we-dont-believe-rumors-of-an-appleverizon-love-child/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BusinessWeek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exclusive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone-lite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media pad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=11307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple and Verizon are in talks for the carrier to distribute an “iPhone-lite” device and a “media pad,” with one of the devices to be launched sometime this summer, BusinessWeek is reporting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Stacey Higginbotham, Writer, GigaOm</p>
<p>Apple (AAPL) and Verizon (VZ) are in talks for the carrier to distribute an “iPhone-lite” device and a “media pad,” with one of the devices to be launched sometime this summer, BusinessWeek is reporting. As a Verizon subscriber, I wish I could believe this story, but we have several reasons to think it’s just a negotiating ploy aimed at getting more concessions from AT&#038;T (T) as it tries to hold onto its iPhone exclusive.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/04/28/why-we-dont-believe-rumors-of-an-appleverizon-love-child/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090429/why-we-dont-believe-rumors-of-an-appleverizon-love-child/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Report Says Tiered Broadband Bad, Unlikely</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080808/new-report-says-tiered-broadband-bad-unlikely/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080808/new-report-says-tiered-broadband-bad-unlikely/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 07:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband caps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limitation pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network congestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P2P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P2P blocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tiered broadband]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=2364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Free Press issued a report this afternoon casting doubt on the theory of network congestion that has been cited by ISPs as the reason behind P2P blocking or broadband caps, and offering more rational solutions for dealing with sporadic congestion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Stacey Higginbotham, Writer, GigaOm</p>
<p>The Free Press issued a report this afternoon casting doubt on the theory of network congestion that has been cited by ISPs as the reason behind P2P blocking or broadband caps, and offering more rational solutions for dealing with sporadic congestion. It also claims that tiered broadband and limitation pricing&#8211;in which a carrier charges per gigabyte fee after users exceed a certain cap&#8211;is unlikely to become reality. Prior to the report coming out, I had spent the afternoon asking people about this issue, trying to figure out if our series of tubes is really clogged or if the carriers are merely seeking financial and/or competitive gain.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/08/07/new-report-says-tiered-broadband-bad-but-unlikely/">Read the rest of this post</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080808/new-report-says-tiered-broadband-bad-unlikely/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five Nines on the Net Is a Pipe Dream</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080707/five-nines-on-the-net-is-a-pipe-dream/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080707/five-nines-on-the-net-is-a-pipe-dream/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 07:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[99.999% uptime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web sites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=1857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times today finally got around to noticing that when web sites go down, people are increasingly likely to get mad and generally react the way I might if I drove to my favorite bar and found it closed for a private party.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Stacey Higginbotham, Writer, GigaOm</p>
<p>The New York Times today finally got around to noticing that when Web sites go down, people are increasingly likely to get mad and generally react the way I might if I drove to my favorite bar and found it closed for a private party. I might be miffed and share a few choice words with members of my party before deciding on a new locale. However, when we write blogs or tweets (if Twitter is up), the inconvenience and our subsequent vitriol is archived forever and transmitted around the world rather than just to our friends. And because millions of other people want to go to that same bar, the chorus of curses grows quickly.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/07/06/five-nines-on-the-net-is-a-pipe-dream/">Read the rest of this post</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080707/five-nines-on-the-net-is-a-pipe-dream/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ten Reasons Enterprises Aren’t Ready to Trust the Cloud</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080703/higginbotham-3/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080703/higginbotham-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=1839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many entrepreneurs today have their heads in the clouds. They’re either outsourcing most of their network infrastructure to a provider such as Amazon Web Services or are building out such infrastructures to capitalize on the incredible momentum around cloud computing. I have no doubt that this is The Next Big Thing in computing, but sometimes I get a little tired of the noise.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Stacey Higginbotham, Blogger, GigaOM</p>
<p>Many entrepreneurs today have their heads in the clouds. They’re either outsourcing most of their network infrastructure to a provider such as Amazon Web Services or are building out such infrastructures to capitalize on the incredible momentum around cloud computing. I have no doubt that this is The Next Big Thing in computing, but sometimes I get a little tired of the noise.  </p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/07/01/10-reasons-enterprises-arent-ready-to-trust-the-cloud/">Read the rest of this post</a></p>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080703/higginbotham-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blaming Airlines, AT&amp;T Takes Flight</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080630/blaming-airlines-att-takes-flight/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080630/blaming-airlines-att-takes-flight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 07:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Antonio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=1775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, while I was returning from San Francisco to Austin, AT&#38;T was letting folks know that it plans to move its headquarters from San Antonio to Dallas.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Stacey Higginbotham, Writer, GigaOm</p>
<p>Yesterday, while I was returning from San Francisco to Austin, AT&#038;T was letting folks know that it plans to move its headquarters from San Antonio to Dallas. A big part of the blame was laid on the lack of direct flights to other big cities, a fact I could appreciate after my indirect, 6-hour journey home. Ironically, as technology (powered in no small part by AT&#038;T ) allows us to innovate anywhere, the financial woes of the airline industry that lead to fewer routes make it much more productive for those who travel to live in large cities.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/06/28/blaming-airlines-att-takes-flight/">Read the rest of this post</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080630/blaming-airlines-att-takes-flight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Woman Troubles in Technology</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080516/woman-troubles-in-technology/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080516/woman-troubles-in-technology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 07:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wii Fit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080516/woman-troubles-in-technology/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times had an article today about the loss of women in the science and technology fields as they hit their 30s and beyond. It cites a report that blames a macho culture intrinsic to those fields. But it's possible that readers in the tech field missed it, as it only ran in the Style section of the paper's Web site rather than the Technology section. Because apparently the loss of female programming and engineering talent has nothing to do with technology and everything to do with the latest swimsuits. An article on the Wii Fit, however, was deemed worthy of appearing in both sections.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Stacey Higginbotham, Writer, GigaOm</p>
<p>The New York Times had an article today about the loss of women in the science and technology fields as they hit their 30s and beyond. It cites a report that blames a macho culture intrinsic to those fields. But it&#8217;s possible that readers in the tech field missed it, as it only ran in the Style section of the paper&#8217;s Web site rather than the Technology section. Because apparently the loss of female programming and engineering talent has nothing to do with technology and everything to do with the latest swimsuits. An article on the Wii Fit, however, was deemed worthy of appearing in both sections.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/05/15/woman-troubles-in-technology/">Read the rest of this post</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080516/woman-troubles-in-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Qualcomm Saves Millions With Green IT</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080512/qualcomm-saves-millions-with-green-it/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080512/qualcomm-saves-millions-with-green-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 07:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleantech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth2Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norm Fjeldheim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qualcomm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080512/qualcomm-saves-millions-with-green-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We often cover semiconductors that require less energy, but we rarely talk to the companies behind those chips to find out what else they might be doing to reduce their power consumption. However, Norm Fjeldheim, chief information officer for Qualcomm, recently shared a few tidbits about what the cellphone chip maker is doing to keep corporate consumption down--and it all starts with information technology (not everyone is jumping ship to build "cleantech" firms).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Stacey Higginbotham, Blogger, Earth2Tech</p>
<p>We often cover semiconductors that require less energy, but we rarely talk to the companies behind those chips to find out what else they might be doing to reduce their power consumption. However, Norm Fjeldheim, chief information officer for Qualcomm, recently shared a few tidbits about what the cellphone chip maker is doing to keep corporate consumption down&#8211;and it all starts with information technology (not everyone is jumping ship to build &#8220;cleantech&#8221; firms).</p>
<p>While it was some 20 years that the Qualcomm IT department instigated a recycling effort that&#8217;s still in effect on the Qualcomm campus today, it is within the last five years that Qualcomm has made its biggest strides. In 2004 it began construction on a new corporate building and attached a data center to the corporate offices.</p>
<p><a href="http://earth2tech.com/2008/05/11/qualcomm-saves-millions-with-green-it/#more-2157">Read the rest of this post</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080512/qualcomm-saves-millions-with-green-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is 4G Via Satellite Destined to Fail?</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080423/higginbotham-2/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080423/higginbotham-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TerreStar Networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080423/higginbotham-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Friday, four executives of satellite holding company TerreStar Networks suddenly resigned, leaving just three people behind to fill the void. I don’t expect this lack of management to last for too long, but until TerreStar calls me back with details, I’m betting that the change in management signals a change in TerreStar’s strategy in that it’s no longer looking for a larger partner to help it build and finance a combined 4G satellite and terrestrial network, but is preparing to move ahead alone.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Stacey Higginbotham, Blogger, GigaOM</p>
<p>Last Friday, four executives of satellite holding company TerreStar Networks suddenly resigned, leaving just three people behind to fill the void. I don’t expect this lack of management to last for too long, but until TerreStar calls me back with details, I’m betting that the change in management signals a change in TerreStar’s strategy in that it’s no longer looking for a larger partner to help it build and finance a combined 4G satellite and terrestrial network, but is preparing to move ahead alone.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/04/22/is-4g-via-satellite-destined-to-fail/">Read the rest of this post</a></p>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080423/higginbotham-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wireless HD Is the New Front in a Standards War</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080410/higginbotham/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080410/higginbotham/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Buy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless HD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080410/higginbotham/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This winter holiday season, visitors to Best Buy will be able to purchase televisions and DVD players with the ability to transmit wireless video in high definition. But before getting too excited about dumping your cords, you should know that there are currently four different ways one can watch wireless HD, and it’s unlikely all of them will be built into consumer devices.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Stacey Higginbotham, Blogger, GigaOm</p>
<p>This winter holiday season, visitors to Best Buy will be able to purchase televisions and DVD players with the ability to transmit wireless video in high definition. But before getting too excited about dumping your cords, you should know that there are currently four different ways one can watch wireless HD, and it’s unlikely all of them will be built into consumer devices.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/04/09/wireless-hd-is-the-new-front-in-a-standards-war/">Read the rest of this post</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080410/higginbotham/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Just Need a Little Touch</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080404/i-just-need-a-little-touch/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080404/i-just-need-a-little-touch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 07:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EDGE network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080404/i-just-need-a-little-touch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After wandering around at CTIA (usually hopelessly lost) I've decided that I was wrong. I need a touch screen and I need it bad. When the iPhone came out, the EDGE network, crappy AT&#38;T coverage in Austin and the hype factor kept me away. Plus, the touch screen on my husband's Treo had always flustered me. I liked the tactile element of hitting keys.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Stacey Higginbotham, Blogger, GigaOm</p>
<p>After wandering around at CTIA (usually hopelessly lost) I&#8217;ve decided that I was wrong. I need a touch screen and I need it bad. When the iPhone came out, the EDGE network, crappy AT&amp;T coverage in Austin and the hype factor kept me away. Plus, the touch screen on my husband&#8217;s Treo had always flustered me. I liked the tactile element of hitting keys.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/04/03/i-just-need-a-little-touch/">Read the rest of this post</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080404/i-just-need-a-little-touch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone Users Are Having More Fun</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080319/iphone-users-are-having-more-fun/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080319/iphone-users-are-having-more-fun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 07:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GigaOm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080319/iphone-users-are-having-more-fun/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New data from M:Metrics for the month of January confirms that folks who own an iPhone tend to do more entertaining things on their devices--such as watch video and visit social networks--than those who own smartphones. However, February data from mobile ad network AdMob points out that iPhone users are still a relatively small part of the overall mobile phone market in the U.S. Good thing, otherwise we'd never get anything done.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Stacey Higginbotham, Blogger, GigaOm</p>
<p>New data from M:Metrics for the month of January confirms that folks who own an iPhone tend to do more entertaining things on their devices&#8211;such as watch video and visit social networks&#8211;than those who own smartphones. However, February data from mobile ad network AdMob points out that iPhone users are still a relatively small part of the overall mobile phone market in the U.S. Good thing, otherwise we&#8217;d never get anything done.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/03/18/iphone-users-are-having-more-fun/">Read the rest of this post</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080319/iphone-users-are-having-more-fun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
