<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Voices &#187; TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://voices.allthingsd.com/tag/tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com</link>
	<description>from other Web sites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:09:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Almost Famous: Brizzly's Chris Wetherell</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091106/almost-famous-brizzlys-chris-wetherell/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091106/almost-famous-brizzlys-chris-wetherell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Drake Martinet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Almost Famous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beaverton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berkeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biz Stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brizzly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Wetherell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[client]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fujitsu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Shellen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letsbetrends.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liar Liar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massless.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microblogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mihai Parparita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roku]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seesmic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[start-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thing Labs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TweetDeck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TwitIQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=17309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new feature wherein All Things Digital looks at up-and-coming and innovative start-ups you should know about.

This week: A video visit with, some questions for and a few pertinent stats about Chris Wetherell and his creation, Brizzly, a Web-based social media reader.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Drake Martinet, Intern, All Things Digital</p>
<p>A new feature wherein <strong>All Things Digital</strong> looks at up-and-coming and innovative start-ups you should know about.</p>
<p>This week: A video visit with, some questions for and a few pertinent stats about Chris Wetherell and his creation, <a href="http://www.brizzly.com"><strong>Brizzly</strong></a>, a Web-based social media reader, one of many in the hot status update arena.</p>
<p><img src="http://voices.allthingsd.com/files//home/chroot/home/aking/public_html/wp-content/blogs.dir/5/files/2009/11/brizzly-founder.jpg" class="photo aligncenter" alt="Brizzly" /></p>
<p><strong>Who</strong>: Chris Wetherell</p>
<p><strong>What</strong>: VP of Technology, <a href="http://www.thinglabs.com/">Thing Labs</a>, creator of Brizzly.</p>
<p><strong>Why</strong>: Brizzly is a Web-based social media software client, for microblogging sites like Twitter or Facebook, expands attachments automatically and allows users to describe and define the trending topics for all its users to see. It&#8217;s in invite-only beta.</p>
<p><strong>Where</strong>: <a href="http://twitter.com/cw/">@cw</a> (Twitter); <a href="http://www.massless.org">massless.org</a> (Wetherell&#8217;s personal blog); San Francisco (HQ for Thing Labs and Brizzly)</p>
<p><strong>Who else</strong>: TweetDeck, Seesmic, TwitIQ</p>
<hr />
<h4 class="subhed">Five Stats You Won&#8217;t Find in his Facebook Profile</h4>
<p><strong>Worst Job</strong>: Assembly line at Fujitsu, making rack servers</p>
<p><strong>Has a Geek Crush on</strong>: Mihai Parparita, Google developer in Boston </p>
<p><strong>Gadget of the Moment</strong>: Roku&#8217;s digital video box. &#8220;It&#8217;s got Netflix, You Tube and TV. <em>Damn</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Wishes There Was an App for</strong>: The legal arena. &#8220;They need to, like, use a computer.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Fails at</strong>: Anything related to email </p>
<hr />
<h4 class="subhed">Bio in 140 Characters</h4>
<p>From Beaverton, Ore. Dropped out of Berkeley. Got hungry as an indie rock drummer. @Google Reader. Left Google, invented Brizzly.</p>
<hr />
<h4 class="subhed">The Five Questions</h4>
<p class="question"><em>Why should I care about Brizzly?</em></p>
<p>It depends on what you&#8217;re looking for. If one of the things that interests you is how a large community is experiencing life&#8211;I mean really interested in the community and not just the idea of your friends&#8211;then Brizzly does that a little more easily than other things. [Brizzly's assets are] no small difference for those who are interested in it.</p>
<p class="question"><em>Why are all Twitter-related logos, including yours, so darn cute?</em></p>
<p><img src="http://voices.allthingsd.com/files//home/chroot/home/aking/public_html/wp-content/blogs.dir/5/files/2009/11/brizzly-logo.jpg" alt="brizzly-logo" title="brizzly-logo" width="240" height="90" class="alignright photo size-full wp-image-16739" /></p>
<p>Yeah, we&#8217;re a little cheeky, right? I think it&#8217;s probably just because of a pendulum swing. I mean, the last thing [Thing Labs' CEO Jason Shellen] and I worked on was the exact opposite. Google Reader is not cuddly. It&#8217;s friendly, but cuddly it isn&#8217;t. The other thing is, we were hoping to try what strong branding is like&#8211;in terms of anthropomorphic animals. The bear design [was drawn by] both Jason and [Twitter Co-founder] Biz Stone.</p>
<p class="question"><em>What can we expect from Thing Labs and Brizzly three months out?</em></p>
<p>We will have at least three richer sets of experiences, some of which include entirely different products all connected through our letsbetrends.com API. </p>
<p class="question"><em>Every geek has a memory where they saw something new and had to say to themselves, &#8220;Dang, I love living in the future.&#8221; What&#8217;s yours?</em></p>
<p>One big one for me was at Google&#8211;it was my first day and someone says, &#8220;Hey, have they taken you to see the robots yet?&#8221; I was like, &#8220;Hahaha&#8230; <em>No</em>.&#8221; They took me to this building where there was a room filled with these Rube Goldbergesque mechanical devices. Large cages with metal bars and wires, culminating in this ball in the center. This girl climbed into the thing. She put her feet in these stirrups and sat in this weird chair, and then this book slides out. The girl started tapping her feet on this base drum pedal and doing this thing with her hands, and then the book slides away [they were scanning the books]. I was like, &#8220;What is this?&#8221; and they said, &#8220;Well, this is Ocean [the internal name for Google Books].&#8221; What struck me was the scale. It was clear to me that they were going to scan ridiculous amounts of information very, very quickly, and I realized: Whoa, THIS is very different.&#8221;</p>
<p class="question"><em>Are you really competitive with rivals?</em></p>
<p>I just don&#8217;t have that kind of fight in me. I mean, I want to kick my own ass. I know there are lots of guys out there who can totally drop the names of someone they want to just crush. I just don&#8217;t have it. I get more frustrated with me, more than anyone else. I&#8217;m like Jim Carrey in &#8220;Liar Liar&#8221;:  &#8220;I&#8217;m kicking <em>my</em> ass.&#8221; </p>
<hr />
<h4 class="subhed">The In Living Color Interview</h4>
<p><div class="video-wsj"><object width="380" height="216"><param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID=5FACE642-4709-4370-9B62-1E417F20B3DA&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/"name="microflashPlayer"></param><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={5FACE642-4709-4370-9B62-1E417F20B3DA}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="380" height="216" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></object>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091106/almost-famous-brizzlys-chris-wetherell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comcast, 1Cast and Boxee</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091022/comcast-1cast-and-boxee/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091022/comcast-1cast-and-boxee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Healey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Healey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=16925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two seemingly unrelated announcements this week illustrate the intensifying pressure on cable TV's business model.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Jon Healey, Editorial Writer, Los Angeles Times</p>
<p>Two seemingly unrelated announcements this week illustrate the intensifying pressure on cable TV&#8217;s business model. Comcast (CMCSA) announced this week that it would make more cable-TV programming available free through the Internet by the end of the year but only to people who get broadband and cable service from Comcast.</p>
<p><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2009/10/comcast-1cast-and-boxee.html">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091022/comcast-1cast-and-boxee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumor Revived: Will Verizon Buy a Sat TV Company?</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090928/rumor-revived-will-verizon-buy-a-sat-tv-company/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090928/rumor-revived-will-verizon-buy-a-sat-tv-company/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Savitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barron's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DirectTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Savitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fixed-line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heard on the Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivan Seidenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Trader Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=15902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On a slow news day, The Wall Street Journal has dusted off the old telco-buys-sat TV company rumors.

In a Heard on the Street piece, The Journal says that the odds of Verizon buying DirecTV could be shortening.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Eric Savitz, Blogger and Columnist, Tech Trader Daily, Barron&#8217;s</p>
<p>On a slow news day, The Wall Street Journal has dusted off the old telco-buys-sat TV company rumors.</p>
<p>In a Heard on the Street piece, The Journal says that the odds of Verizon (VZ) buying DirecTV (DTV) could be shortening. The theory is based on Verizon CEO Ivan Seidenberg&#8217;s recent remark that he wants to make video the company’s core product for its fixed-line business; the story asserts that the best way to do that would be to buy a satellite TV company&#8211;and that the best one to buy would be DTV.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2009/09/25/rumor-revived-will-verizon-buy-a-sat-tv-company/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090928/rumor-revived-will-verizon-buy-a-sat-tv-company/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Still Trying to Put Smarts Into the Boob Tube</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090925/intel-still-trying-to-put-smarts-into-the-boob-tube/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090925/intel-still-trying-to-put-smarts-into-the-boob-tube/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web sites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=15818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Silicon Valley has been talking for 15 years or so about marrying TV and the Internet. For the most part, it’s still just talk; most people still use their PCs when they want interactivity, and rely on their TVs when they want to be passive content-watchers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Don Clark, Reporter, The Wall Street Journal</p>
<p>Silicon Valley has been talking for 15 years or so about marrying TV and the Internet. For the most part, it’s still just talk; most people still use their PCs when they want interactivity, and rely on their TVs when they want to be passive content-watchers.</p>
<p>But Intel (INTC) is not giving up. The chip giant, having run along with partners down most of the blind alleys of interactive television, gave an update this week about a reformulated TV strategy that might be paraphrased as follows: it’s the software, stupid.</p>
<p>In other words, people don’t want to visit Web sites or engage in other PC-like activities while relaxing in front of their big-screen TV. </p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/09/24/intel-still-trying-to-put-smarts-into-the-boob-tube/">Read the rest of this post</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090925/intel-still-trying-to-put-smarts-into-the-boob-tube/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why You Want TV Everywhere&#8211;Now</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090917/why-you-want-tv-everywhere-%e2%80%93-now/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090917/why-you-want-tv-everywhere-%e2%80%93-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Cuban</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog Maverick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DirecTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTouch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Cuban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zune]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=15532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TV Everywhere is a concept put out by TV distributors that basically says that if you pay for cable or satellite, you should be able to watch the content you want, where you want. Everywhere. To some people this is not a good idea.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Mark Cuban, Blogger, Blog Maverick</p>
<p>TV Everywhere is a concept put out by TV distributors that basically says that if you pay for cable or satellite, you should be able to watch the content you want, where you want. Everywhere. To some people this is not a good idea. </p>
<p>As is always the case, many people think tv programming should be widely available for free on the internet. Of course the content is never free. Someone has to pay to create it and we purchasers of cable and satellite services pay the subscription fees that pay the content companies and allow them to create all that content.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogmaverick.com/2009/09/15/why-you-want-tv-everywhere-now/">Read the rest of the post at the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090917/why-you-want-tv-everywhere-%e2%80%93-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Story Behind the Story</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090916/the-story-behind-the-storymark-bowden/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090916/the-story-behind-the-storymark-bowden/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bowden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Bowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonya Sotomayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Atlantic.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=15463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With journalists being laid off in droves, ideologues have stepped forward to provide the "reporting" that feeds the 24-hour news cycle.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Mark Bowden, National Correspondent, Atlantic Monthly</p>
<p>With journalists being laid off in droves, ideologues have stepped forward to provide the &#8220;reporting&#8221; that feeds the 24-hour news cycle. The collapse of journalism means that the quest for information has been superseded by the quest for ammunition. A case-study of our post-journalistic age.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200910/media">Read the rest of this post at the original site</a></p>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090916/the-story-behind-the-storymark-bowden/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Metacafe Adds a Hub for TV</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090609/metacafe-adds-a-hub-for-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090609/metacafe-adds-a-hub-for-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew LaVallee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew LaVallee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAG Ventures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erick Hachenburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Highland Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metacafe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nurse Jackie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palo Alto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=12511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Metacafe, seeking to reach more “media-snacking” consumers, is launching a section of its video site devoted to short clips from “Nurse Jackie,” “Weeds,” “Big Brother” and other television shows.

The Palo Alto, Calif., company, which is funded by Highland Capital Partners and DAG Ventures, focuses on what it sees as a middle ground between YouTube and Hulu — short-form videos that are professionally produced or poised to go viral — said its chief executive, Erick Hachenburg, a former Electronics Arts executive.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Andrew LaVallee, Reporter, The Wall Street Journal</p>
<p>Metacafe, seeking to reach more “media-snacking” consumers, is launching a section of its video site devoted to short clips from “Nurse Jackie,” “Weeds,” “Big Brother” and other television shows.</p>
<p>The Palo Alto, Calif., company, which is funded by Highland Capital Partners and DAG Ventures, focuses on what it sees as a middle ground between YouTube and Hulu&#8211;short-form videos that are professionally produced or poised to go viral&#8211;said its chief executive, Erick Hachenburg, a former Electronics Arts (ERTS) executive.</p>
<p>YouTube has a high percentage of personal or response videos, he said, while Hulu is where consumers go to watch an entire TV episode. Metacafe.com, in contrast, is pared down to channels for movie trailers, sports clips and music videos. It had about 7.3 million unique video viewers in April, according to comScore (SCOR), compared with Hulu’s 40.1 million uniques.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/06/09/metacafe-adds-a-hub-for-tv/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090609/metacafe-adds-a-hub-for-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Department Sides with Cablevision Against Hollywood</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090601/justice-department-sides-with-cablevision-against-hollywood/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090601/justice-department-sides-with-cablevision-against-hollywood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 07:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Healey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cablevision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Healey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=12240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just what, exactly, are all those Hollywood types getting in return for their investment in Barack Obama's presidential bid?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Jon Healey, Writer, Los Angeles Times</p>
<p>Just what, exactly, are all those Hollywood types getting in return for their investment in Barack Obama&#8217;s presidential bid? The Justice Department, a steady ally for the entertainment industry on copyright issues during the Bush administration, today opposed the studios in a potentially precedent-setting dispute with Cablevision over TV recording services.</p>
<p><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2009/05/cablevision-network-dvr-supreme-court-obama-administration.html">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090601/justice-department-sides-with-cablevision-against-hollywood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T Workers Create “Ready to Strike” Ringtone</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090410/att-workers-create-%e2%80%9cready-to-strike%e2%80%9d-ringtone/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090410/att-workers-create-%e2%80%9cready-to-strike%e2%80%9d-ringtone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew LaVallee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew LaVallee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communications Workers of America Local 6222]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray and Rachael Rodriguez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ready to Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Riley Wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ringtone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[song]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U-Verse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=10612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AT&#38;T and the union representing its workers are still in contract talks, but workers have published a song, with accompanying ringtone, called “Ready to Strike,” just in case.

The song’s pro-labor lyrics include “Get ready to strike, get ready to walk the line” and “Protect my health care, don’t lower my wages/Realize, recognize, mobilize, stay alive” and even a shout-out to technicians who support U-verse, AT&#38;T’s TV service.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Andrew LaVallee, Reporter, Wall Street Journal</p>
<p>AT&#038;T and the union representing its workers are still in contract talks, but workers have published a song, with accompanying ringtone, called “Ready to Strike,” just in case.</p>
<p>The song’s pro-labor lyrics include “Get ready to strike, get ready to walk the line” and “Protect my health care, don’t lower my wages/Realize, recognize, mobilize, stay alive” and even a shout-out to technicians who support U-verse, AT&#038;T’s TV service.</p>
<p>It was co-written by Ray and Rachael Rodriguez, AT&#038;T (T) employees who are active in the Communications Workers of America Local 6222, as well as Riley Wallace, a Toronto hip-hop artist whose stage name is Special.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/04/10/att-workers-create-ringtone/">Read the rest of this post</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090410/att-workers-create-%e2%80%9cready-to-strike%e2%80%9d-ringtone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Does the Math on the “Apple Tax.” Badly.</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090410/microsoft-does-the-math-on-the-%e2%80%9capple-tax%e2%80%9d-badly/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090410/microsoft-does-the-math-on-the-%e2%80%9capple-tax%e2%80%9d-badly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harry McCracken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry McCracken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laptop Hunter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technologizer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=10550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I said in my post last Sunday on Microsoft’s “Laptop Hunter” ads, it’s unrealistic to expect TV commercials to contribute to a thoughtful discussion of anything.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Harry McCracken, Blogger, Technologizer</p>
<p>As I said in my post last Sunday on Microsoft’s “Laptop Hunter” ads, it’s unrealistic to expect TV commercials to contribute to a thoughtful discussion of anything. An exercise in comparison shopping between Windows and PCs that takes place in a sixty-second Microsoft (MSFT) commercial just isn’t going to be fair and balanced, any more than an Apple (AAPL) commercial is going to explain that it’s possible to get respectable Windows laptops for a whole lot less than the cheapest Macs.</p>
<p><a href="http://technologizer.com/2009/04/09/microsoft-does-the-math-on-the-apple-tax-badly/">Read the rest of this post</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090410/microsoft-does-the-math-on-the-%e2%80%9capple-tax%e2%80%9d-badly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web Video's Savior May Be "Product Placement"</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090326/web-videos-savior-may-be-product-placement/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090326/web-videos-savior-may-be-product-placement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maria Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashton Kutcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blah Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branded content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maria Russo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product placement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wrap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VitaminWater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=9842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the very phrase "product placement" elicits jeers and hisses in the TV and movie worlds, on the Web something surprising has been happening: Branded content is emerging as not just a promising way to make money, but as creatively viable as well. Take Ashton Kutcher’s “Blah Girls,” which features sassy teen celebrity-bloggers who pause occasionally to quaff VitaminWater as they chase celebrity dirt.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Maria Russo, Contributing Writer, The Wrap</p>
<p>While the very phrase &#8220;product placement&#8221; elicits jeers and hisses in the TV and movie worlds, on the Web something surprising has been happening: Branded content is emerging as not just a promising way to make money, but as creatively viable as well. Take Ashton Kutcher’s “Blah Girls,” which features sassy teen celebrity-bloggers who pause occasionally to quaff VitaminWater as they chase celebrity dirt.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thewrap.com/article/2044">Read the rest of this post</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090326/web-videos-savior-may-be-product-placement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why TV Lost</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090304/why-tv-lost/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090304/why-tv-lost/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 08:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[convergence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paulgraham.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV shows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=9087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 20 years ago people noticed computers and TV were on a collision course and started to speculate about what they'd produce when they converged. We now know the answer: computers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Paul Graham, Programmer, Paulgraham.com</p>
<p>About 20 years ago people noticed computers and TV were on a collision course and started to speculate about what they&#8217;d produce when they converged. We now know the answer: computers. It&#8217;s clear now that even by using the word &#8220;convergence&#8221; we were giving TV too much credit. This won&#8217;t be convergence so much as replacement. People may still watch things they call &#8220;TV shows,&#8221; but they&#8217;ll watch them mostly on computers.</p>
<p>What decided the contest for computers? Four forces, three of which one could have predicted, and one that would have been harder to.</p>
<p><a href="http://paulgraham.com/convergence.html">Read the rest of this post</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090304/why-tv-lost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Six Ways "Late Night With Jimmy Fallon" Plans to Change TV Forever</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090302/six-ways-late-night-with-jimmy-fallon-plans-to-change-tv-forever/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090302/six-ways-late-night-with-jimmy-fallon-plans-to-change-tv-forever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 08:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Carlson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30 Rockefeller Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4chan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attack of the Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gavin Purcell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Fallon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Late Night]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicholas Carlson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sega]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Alley Insider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talk show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=8966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walking into Gavin Purcell's office at 30 Rockefeller Center the first thing you notice is his computer monitor. It's a 52-inch flat screen mounted to the wall across from his desk. The desktop background is a picture of a Sega Light Phaser. Ladies and gentleman, the co-producer of NBC's "Late Night  With Jimmy Fallon"--debuting Monday--is a geek.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Nicholas Carlson, Blogger, Silicon Alley Insider</p>
<p>Walking into Gavin Purcell&#8217;s office at 30 Rockefeller Center the first thing you notice is his computer monitor. It&#8217;s a 52-inch flat screen mounted to the wall across from his desk. The desktop background is a picture of a Sega Light Phaser.</p>
<p>Ladies and gentleman, the co-producer of NBC&#8217;s &#8220;Late Night  With Jimmy Fallon&#8221;&#8211;debuting Monday&#8211;is a geek.</p>
<p>Or at least the former producer of G4&#8217;s Attack of the Show, is geek-y. He&#8217;s not stuck in a basement somewhere uploading pictures to 4chan, but he knows what 4chan is.</p>
<p>The point is that Gavin and his team are bringing a new sensibility to the business of making a late-night talk show. It&#8217;s one that they developed by living in an Internet-connected world. &#8220;Late Night With Jimmy Fallon&#8221; will be a talk show for the Twitter era.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/the-jimmy-fallon-shows-tv-business-innovations-2009-2">Read the rest of this post</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090302/six-ways-late-night-with-jimmy-fallon-plans-to-change-tv-forever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stalled Switch to Digital TV a Classic Tale of Breakdown</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090217/stalled-switch-to-digital-tv-a-classic-tale-of-breakdown/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090217/stalled-switch-to-digital-tv-a-classic-tale-of-breakdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Hart and Peter Whoriskey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Committee on Energy and Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital transition bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DTV Transition Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward J. Markey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin J. Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Hart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark L. Goldstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael J. Copps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Telecommunications and Information Administrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Whoriskey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=8545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The nation's switch to all-digital broadcasts has been more than a decade in the making. Until last week, the United States seemed ready to follow the half-dozen European countries that have made the switch. But with two federal agencies in charge, no clear idea of how many people would be affected and constant partisan disagreements over money, the program foundered just before its longstanding Feb. 17 deadline.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Kim Hart and Peter Whoriskey, Staff Writers, Washington Post</p>
<p>The nation&#8217;s switch to all-digital broadcasts has been more than a decade in the making. The federal government has spent nearly $2 billion to help people prepare. Broadcasters spent another $1.2 billion to run warning ads and millions more to upgrade equipment. Until last week, the United States seemed ready to follow the half-dozen European countries that have made the switch. </p>
<p>But with two federal agencies in charge, no clear idea of how many people would be affected and constant partisan disagreements over money, the program foundered just before its longstanding Feb. 17 deadline. It has now been pushed back four months. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/13/AR2009021303504.html?hpid=topnews">Read the rest of this post</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090217/stalled-switch-to-digital-tv-a-classic-tale-of-breakdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Cuts Off Its Big-Media Dreams</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090213/google-cuts-off-its-big-media-dreams/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090213/google-cuts-off-its-big-media-dreams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Owen Thomas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clickstream data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cutbacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dMarc Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet search ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Napoleon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owen Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sergey Brin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Wojcicki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valleywag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=8495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like Napoleon marching into an abandoned Moscow, Larry Page and Sergey Brin have led Google's advance into traditional advertising only to find nothing to loot. Now begins Google's long imperial retreat, starting with 40 layoffs. But the real cut here is to Google's ambitions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Owen Thomas, Managing Editor, Valleywag</p>
<p>Like Napoleon marching into an abandoned Moscow, Larry Page and Sergey Brin have led Google&#8217;s advance into traditional advertising only to find nothing to loot. Now begins Google&#8217;s long imperial retreat, starting with 40 layoffs.</p>
<p>Susan Wojcicki, the millionaire sister-in-law of Brin who also holds a management role in the company, announced the job cuts in a blog post, as she laid out plans for Google (GOOG) to exit the business of brokering radio ads, a business it entered in 2006 when it bought dMarc Broadcasting for $102 million.</p>
<p>Up to 40 Googlers will lose their jobs, a small percentage of the 20,000 remaining employees at the search giant. But the real cut here is to Google&#8217;s ambitions.</p>
<p><a href="http://valleywag.gawker.com/5152688/google-cuts-off-its-big+media-dreams">Read the rest of this post</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090213/google-cuts-off-its-big-media-dreams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
