<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Voices &#187; Wired</title>
	<atom:link href="http://voices.allthingsd.com/tag/wired/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com</link>
	<description>from other Web sites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:20:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>In Industry First, Voting Machine Company to Publish Source Code</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091029/in-industry-first-voting-machine-company-to-publish-source-code/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091029/in-industry-first-voting-machine-company-to-publish-source-code/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Zetter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Zetter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sequoia Voting Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Threat Level]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=17173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sequoia Voting Systems plans to publicly release the source code for its new optical scan voting system, the company announced Tuesday--a remarkable reversal for a voting machine maker long criticized for resisting public examination of its proprietary systems.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Kim Zetter, Contributor, Threat Level, Wired</p>
<p>Sequoia Voting Systems plans to publicly release the source code for its new optical scan voting system, the company announced Tuesday&#8211;a remarkable reversal for a voting machine maker long criticized for resisting public examination of its proprietary systems.</p>
<p>The company’s new public source optical-scan voting system, called Frontier Election System, will be submitted for federal certification and testing in the first quarter of next year. The code will be released for public review in November, the company said, on its web site. Sequoia’s proprietary, closed systems are currently used in 16 states and the District of Columbia.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/10/sequoia/">Read the rest of this post at the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091029/in-industry-first-voting-machine-company-to-publish-source-code/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big-Box Breach: The Inside Story of Wal-Mart’s Hacker Attack</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091014/big-box-breach-the-inside-story-of-wal-mart%e2%80%99s-hacker-attack/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091014/big-box-breach-the-inside-story-of-wal-mart%e2%80%99s-hacker-attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Zetter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Zetter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Threat Level]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=16570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wal-Mart was the victim of a serious security breach in 2005 and 2006 in which hackers targeted the development team in charge of the chain’s point-of-sale system and siphoned source code and other sensitive data to a computer in Eastern Europe, Wired.com has learned.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Kim Zetter, Contributor, Threat Level, Wired</p>
<p>Wal-Mart (WMT) was the victim of a serious security breach in 2005 and 2006 in which hackers targeted the development team in charge of the chain’s point-of-sale system and siphoned source code and other sensitive data to a computer in Eastern Europe, Wired.com has learned.</p>
<p>Internal documents reveal for the first time that the nation’s largest retailer was among the earliest targets of a wave of cyberattacks that went after the bank-card processing systems of brick-and-mortar stores around the United States beginning in 2005. The details of the breach, and the company’s challenges in reconstructing what happened, shed new light on the vulnerable state of retail security at the time, despite card-processing security standards that had been in place since 2001.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/10/walmart-hack/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091014/big-box-breach-the-inside-story-of-wal-mart%e2%80%99s-hacker-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Telephone Company Is Arm of Government, Feds Admit in Spy Suit</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091012/telephone-company-is-arm-of-government-feds-admit-in-spy-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091012/telephone-company-is-arm-of-government-feds-admit-in-spy-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Singel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Singel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Threat Level]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=16478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Justice has finally admitted it in court papers: The nation’s telecom companies are an arm of the government--at least when it comes to secret spying.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Ryan Singel, Staff Writer, Wired</p>
<p>The Department of Justice has finally admitted it in court papers: The  nation’s telecom companies are an arm of the government&#8211;at least when it comes to secret spying.</p>
<p>Fortunately, a judge says that relationship isn’t enough to squash a rights group’s open records request for communications between the nation’s telecoms and the feds.</p>
<p>The Electronic Frontier Foundation wanted to see what role telecom lobbying of the Justice Department played when the government began its year-long, and ultimately successful, push to win retroactive immunity for AT&#038;T (T) and others being sued for unlawfully spying on American citizens.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/10/att-doj-foia/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091012/telephone-company-is-arm-of-government-feds-admit-in-spy-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Online Privacy a Generational Issue?</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091002/is-online-privacy-a-generational-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091002/is-online-privacy-a-generational-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 07:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Denmead, Heather West</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital natives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geek Dad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heather West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Denmead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=16158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems like every time I talk to people about privacy, there’s a feeling that younger users of online tools simply don’t care about the issue.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Ken Denmead, Heather West, Blogger, Wired; Policy Analyst at the Center for Democracy &#038; Technology</p>
<p>It seems like every time I talk to people about privacy, there’s a feeling that younger users of online tools simply don’t care about the issue. Often, I am asked why privacy advocates like CDT push government and industry to protect privacy more robustly&#8211;when &#8220;no one cares&#8221;? In short, people seem to be asserting that digital natives like myself do not value privacy online. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2009/10/is-online-privacy-a-generational-issue/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091002/is-online-privacy-a-generational-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside the Apocalyptic Soviet Doomsday Machine</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090924/inside-the-apocalyptic-soviet-doomsday-machine/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090924/inside-the-apocalyptic-soviet-doomsday-machine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Thompson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doomsday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicholas Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=15783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Valery Yarynich glances nervously over his shoulder. Clad in a brown leather jacket, the 72-year-old former Soviet colonel is hunkered in the back of the dimly lit Iron Gate restaurant in Washington, DC. It's March 2009—the Berlin Wall came down two decades ago--but the lean and fit Yarynich is as jumpy as an informant dodging the KGB.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Nicholas Thompson, Senior Editor, Wired Magazine</p>
<p>Valery Yarynich glances nervously over his shoulder. Clad in a brown leather jacket, the 72-year-old former Soviet colonel is hunkered in the back of the dimly lit Iron Gate restaurant in Washington, DC. It&#8217;s March 2009—the Berlin Wall came down two decades ago&#8211;but the lean and fit Yarynich is as jumpy as an informant dodging the KGB. He begins to whisper, quietly but firmly.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Perimeter system is very, very nice,&#8221; he says. &#8220;We remove unique responsibility from high politicians and the military.&#8221; He looks around again.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/politics/security/magazine/17-10/mf_deadhand">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090924/inside-the-apocalyptic-soviet-doomsday-machine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawsuit: Copyright Filtering Technology Infringes</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090922/lawsuit-copyright-filtering-technology-infringes/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090922/lawsuit-copyright-filtering-technology-infringes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 07:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Kravets</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Kravets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scribd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Threat Level]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=15677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright filtering technology is a form of copyright infringement, according to a lawsuit against document service Scribd.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By David Kravets, Contributor, Threat Level, Wired</p>
<p>Copyright filtering technology is a form of copyright infringement, according to a lawsuit against document service Scribd.</p>
<p>The lawsuit, lodged in a Texas federal court Friday, broaches a novel legal theory in which the U.S. courts have never squarely decided.</p>
<p>The suit maintains that the copying and insertion of a copyrighted work into a filtering system without compensating the copyright holder, or obtaining their consent, is a violation of the Copyright Act. The case comes as copyright filtering technology is quickly becoming a behind-the-scenes feature on university sites, user-generated content sites and online social networking venues.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/09/infringingfiltering/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090922/lawsuit-copyright-filtering-technology-infringes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intelligence Analyst Says Hacking Charge Doesn’t Compute</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090921/intelligence-analyst-says-hacking-charge-doesn%e2%80%99t-compute/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090921/intelligence-analyst-says-hacking-charge-doesn%e2%80%99t-compute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 07:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Poulsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Poulsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Threat Level]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=15624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Defense Department intelligence analyst hit with a federal computer hacking charge last week says he’s being made a scapegoat for a security slip-up that sent a password in a nationwide terrorism investigation to "tens of thousands" of analysts without the need-to-know.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Kevin Poulsen, Blogger, Threat Level, Wired</p>
<p>A Defense Department intelligence analyst hit with a federal computer hacking charge last week says he’s being made a scapegoat for a security slip-up that sent a password in a nationwide terrorism investigation to &#8220;tens of thousands&#8221; of analysts without the need-to-know.</p>
<p>&#8220;I think on one of the blogs, somebody said, how about this: I give you my username and password, you log into my account, and then I file criminal charges against you,&#8221; said Brian Keith Montgomery, in a telephone interview with Threat Level on Thursday. &#8220;That person hit it right on the head.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/09/montgomery_defense/">Read the rest of this post at the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090921/intelligence-analyst-says-hacking-charge-doesn%e2%80%99t-compute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our Craigslist</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090917/our-craigslist/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090917/our-craigslist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Khoi Vinh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craigslist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisa Strausfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luke Hayman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Wiley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Lau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SimpleScott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subtraction.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=15524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cover story for the September 2009 issue of Wired takes a look at the current state of Craigslist and the challenges it faces as it continues to evolve. In a sidebar, the magazine’s amazing art director Scott Dadich invited several designers to re-imagine and redesign Craigslist itself.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Khoi Vinh, Design Director, NYTimes.com.</p>
<p>The cover story for the September 2009 issue of Wired takes a look at the current state of Craigslist and the challenges it faces as it continues to evolve. In a sidebar, the magazine’s amazing art director Scott Dadich invited several designers to re-imagine and redesign Craigslist itself.</p>
<p>In addition to inviting contributions from SimpleScott, who was the former design director at BarackObama.com, Matt Wiley of Studio8 Design, and Luke Hayman and Lisa Strausfeld of Pentagram, Scott was kind enough to ask me for my take as well, and I leapt at the chance. I conscripted two colleagues from my design team at NYTimes.com to help me: Anh Dang who provided an invaluable sounding board for the information architecture and interaction design, and Paul Lau, who helped turn around the visual design literally over a weekend. You’ll see the mock-ups we submitted on page 104 of the magazine or, here at this link. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.subtraction.com/2009/09/15/our-craigslist">Read the rest of the post at the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090917/our-craigslist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media, Your Constant Friend in Any Crisis</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090910/alt-text-social-media-your-constant-friend-in-any-crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090910/alt-text-social-media-your-constant-friend-in-any-crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lore Sjoberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alt. Text]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lore Sjoberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storm drain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=15201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two Australian girls, lost in a storm drain, recently used their cellphones to update Facebook to alert people about their predicament rather than calling emergency services.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Lore Sjoberg, Columnist, Alt. Text, Wired.com</p>
<p>Two Australian girls, lost in a storm drain, recently used their cellphones to update Facebook to alert people about their predicament rather than calling emergency services. Some reports indicate they also took the time to complete a &#8220;Which Smurf Are You Quiz,&#8221; and got the result &#8220;Dangerously Oblivious Smurf.&#8221;</p>
<p>This could be a trend.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/underwire/2009/09/alt-text-social-media-your-constant-friend-in-any-crisis/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090910/alt-text-social-media-your-constant-friend-in-any-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clive Thompson on the New Literacy</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090831/clive-thompson-on-the-new-literacy/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090831/clive-thompson-on-the-new-literacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clive Thompson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clive Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illiteracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Sutherland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PowerPoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=14864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the school year begins, be ready to hear pundits fretting once again about how kids today can't write--and technology is to blame.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Clive Thompson, Contributing Writer, Wired</p>
<p>As the school year begins, be ready to hear pundits fretting once again about how kids today can&#8217;t write&#8211;and technology is to blame. Facebook encourages narcissistic blabbering, video and PowerPoint have replaced carefully crafted essays, and texting has dehydrated language into &#8220;bleak, bald, sad shorthand&#8221; (as University College of London English professor John Sutherland has moaned). An age of illiteracy is at hand, right?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/17-09/st_thompson">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090831/clive-thompson-on-the-new-literacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Good Enough Revolution: When Cheap and Simple Is Just Fine</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090827/the-good-enough-revolution-when-cheap-and-simple-is-just-fine/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090827/the-good-enough-revolution-when-cheap-and-simple-is-just-fine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 07:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Capps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ariel Braunstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Kaplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pure Digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Capps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=14788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2001, Jonathan Kaplan and Ariel Braunstein noticed a quirk in the camera market. All the growth was in expensive digital cameras, but the best-selling units by far were still cheap, disposable film models. That year, a whopping 181 million disposables were sold in the US, compared with around 7 million digital cameras.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Robert Capps, Senior Editor, Wired</p>
<p>In 2001, Jonathan Kaplan and Ariel Braunstein noticed a quirk in the camera market. All the growth was in expensive digital cameras, but the best-selling units by far were still cheap, disposable film models. That year, a whopping 181 million disposables were sold in the US, compared with around 7 million digital cameras. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgets/miscellaneous/magazine/17-09/ff_goodenough?currentPage=all">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090827/the-good-enough-revolution-when-cheap-and-simple-is-just-fine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Craigslist Is Such a Mess</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090825/why-craigslist-is-such-a-mess/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090825/why-craigslist-is-such-a-mess/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craigslist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Wolf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prostitutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=14683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Internet’s great promise is to make the world's information universally accessible and useful.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Gary Wolf, Contributing Editor, Wired</p>
<p>The Internet’s great promise is to make the world&#8217;s information universally accessible and useful. So how come when you arrive at the most popular dating site in the US you find a stream of anonymous come-ons intermixed with insults, ads for prostitutes, naked pictures, and obvious scams?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/entertainment/theweb/magazine/17-09/ff_craigslist">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090825/why-craigslist-is-such-a-mess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beatles' "Yellow Submarine" May Surface as 3-D Remake</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090821/beatles-yellow-submarine-may-surface-as-3-d-remake/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090821/beatles-yellow-submarine-may-surface-as-3-d-remake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 07:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Hart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beatles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue Meanies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugh Hart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lennon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCartney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Zemeckis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Underwire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=14611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can Hollywood improve on a Beatles classic?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Hugh Hart, Blogger, Wired, Underwire</p>
<p>Can Hollywood improve on a Beatles classic? Director Robert Zemeckis and Disney evidently hope to do just that with a 3-D remake of Yellow Submarine. The 1968 cartoon featured McCartney-Lennon gems including “Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds,” “Eleanor Rigby,” “When I’m Sixty-Four” and “With a Little Help From My Friends” in a fantasy involving grumpy grownup types called Blue Meanies.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/underwire/2009/08/beatles-yellow-submarine-3-d-remake/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090821/beatles-yellow-submarine-may-surface-as-3-d-remake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alt Text: Apple's Appalling Approach to iPhone App Approvals</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090812/alt-text-apples-appalling-approach-to-iphone-app-approvals/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090812/alt-text-apples-appalling-approach-to-iphone-app-approvals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lore Sjoberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alt. Text]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[approval process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lore Sjoberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=14282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple has been getting a lot of criticism for its iPhone app approval process. Developers are calling the criteria for approval inconsistent and unclear, and some have suggested that the final approval involves asking a hamster named Monroe whether he would like some dried carrot.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Lore Sjoberg, Columnist, Alt. Text, Wired.com</p>
<p>Apple (AAPL) has been getting a lot of criticism for its iPhone app approval process. Developers are calling the criteria for approval inconsistent and unclear, and some have suggested that the final approval involves asking a hamster named Monroe whether he would like some dried carrot. If Monroe has a tummy ache that day, it’s back to the drawing board. Apple has neither confirmed nor denied this rumor.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/underwire/2009/08/alt-text-apples-appalling-approach-to-iphone-app-approvals/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090812/alt-text-apples-appalling-approach-to-iphone-app-approvals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open Sesame! Network Attack Literally Unlocks Doors.</title>
		<link>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090804/open-sesame-network-attack-literally-unlocks-doors/</link>
		<comments>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090804/open-sesame-network-attack-literally-unlocks-doors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 07:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Zetter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic access system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Zetter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartcards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Threat Level]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=14005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Security researchers have spent a lot of time the last couple of years cracking building access systems from the level of the user device--RFID and smartcards, for example.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Kim Zetter, Contributor, Threat Level, Wired</p>
<p>Security researchers have spent a lot of time the last couple of years cracking building access systems from the level of the user device&#8211;RFID and smartcards, for example.</p>
<p>But a researcher in Texas found that he could crack one electronic access system at the network control level and simply open a door with a spoofed command sent over the network, eliminating the need for an access card.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/08/open-sesame/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a>
<div class="voices-bio"></div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.allthingsd.com/20090804/open-sesame-network-attack-literally-unlocks-doors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
